Preventing Islamic Terror Attacks: Japan’s Failing Strategy

Here’s a question: should Japan import millions of Muslims to aid its efforts to suppress muslim violence in that country? If your answer is Japan doesn’t have muslim violence precisely because it doesn’t have muslims there trying to help solve it then you really don’t understand the question being asked. So I’ll rephrase it more candidly: what rhetorical pap would convince a sufficient number of Japanese to relinquish their country to hostile foreigners?

In many ways, such questions form the landscape of our age: a topography of oily cant strewn about the culture in hopes of it attaching to the gullible. And, of course, in nearly every instance the adhesive is strictly applied on one side only. After all, English colonists brought beneficial diversity to the monochromatic American Indians, as Europeans did in all-black Africa. Think of the delicious European restaurants! Plainly native opposition to this inclusion was borne of hate and bigotry and Hitler. But that’s not where the tar is intended to stick, is it?

Instead we are told—not asked—to repeat obvious lies. Not because these lies are made believable, but because not believing is punished. And having the tailwind of punishment at their back makes for very lazy propagandists. For instance, this blog has no power but whatever power it has to convince. But if your livelihoods depended upon public affirmations (or at least no public denials) of the content here, then the combox would be jammed with obsequious huzzahs. And I wouldn’t have to bother convincing you of anything.

There are a multitude of these ridiculous lies, or liturgy I suppose would be just as accurate. And while all are endlessly repeated as any mantra intended to bolster acceptance, one I noted recently is the remarkably counterintuitive Japanese example above. The proposition being that doors keep people who want to hurt you out of your house, which frustrates the people who want to hurt you, so remove the doors. There is one group who will always appreciate the simple elegance of this theory: people who want to hurt you.

As a matter of routine, recently allotted real estate to members of this cohort. Opining critically on Trump’s milquetoast not-a-muslim ban…

The ban is so obviously, palpably, indeed explicitly anti-Muslim in nature that it has — understandably — offended Muslim-American communities around the world, including in the United States. Yet those are precisely the communities that can prove critical for identifying and responding to individuals becoming radicalized by groups like ISIS and al Qaeda.

Perhaps an even more elegant solution to public safety would be to import fewer easily offended communities. For what intelligence gathering do we need these sensitive and excitable parties in the absence of individuals prone to Islamic radicalization? I mean I’m not prone to joining ISIS or al qaeda. Are you? What percentage of white westerners would be? And of this number, how many would be thwarted by importing more foreign Muslims? The more I think about this, the less I like the CNN “watch them in your house” terror-prevention model. In fact, I am increasingly certain the Japanese “ignore them in their own house” concept results in a much more peaceful and less offended polity.

But that’s an archaic form of Western logic: the kind that doesn’t accrue to our detriment. For modern sensibilities, you’re just going to have to step in the pap and pretend to like it.


9 thoughts on “Preventing Islamic Terror Attacks: Japan’s Failing Strategy

  1. “offended Muslim-American communities around the world”

    world? muslim comes to america. becomes american. goes back to turd world toilet bowl to be muslim-american.

    if only the magik-durt actually worked that way.

  2. Pingback: Preventing Islamic Terror Attacks: Japan’s Failing Strategy | Reaction Times

  3. Indentured servant ran to the hard country and married a squaw.
    Tanned and redheaded better than dead.

    Monochromatic my arse. Shiny. And that is how there is no last prophet. Or much of anything else, for that matter.

  4. the Japanese “ignore them in their own house” concept results in a much more peaceful and less offended polity.

    Its funny, the policy works so well, but is not copied by the western world. If you ever needed more evidence of the fact that we are living in a post-logic world, here it is.

    Also, its worth mentioning that the CNN article, at least tacitly, admits that muslims are indeed very prone to getting ‘offended’, and that when offended, they are prone to getting violent. Yet, despite this, we should bring in more of them.

    • >>the fact that we are living in a post-logic world, here it is.

      It’s only “post-logic” if one assumes that the goal of the governments of the Western countries is the well-being of their peoples. Under a different assumption, it is very logical indeed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s