Conservatism the Hemlock of Conservatives

History is the tale of results. And conservatism is the tale of pretending otherwise.

Both of which lead me to wonder how many of those on the respectable right believe that reaching a desirable location occurs simply by meticulous adherence to proper driving protocols. For instance, does a fully-serviced vehicle—with hands at nine and three—driven precisely according transportation regulations and manufacturer recommendations take its passengers to a positive destination simply by virtue of process?

Ok kids, according to theory if we stay within the speed limit and signal all lane changes we should end up somewhere nice…maybe even Disney World. So cross your fingers!

I imagine the more cynical members of this father’s brood would be less concerned with the process of driving than in the results of where it takes them. And that’s the type of kid who has a bleak future in mainstream conservatism.

The right’s long retreat in America is littered with paeans to process over results. Vast conservative multitudes profess to an implicit belief that just following the constitution will surely take our country somewhere nice. Yet quietly does that parchment squawk when ostensible adherence to its prescriptions advances the left’s agenda in opposition to that of its own defenders. What an eerie indifference. It’s almost as if it’s not even human.

Of course the Supreme Court has always been our most visible petri-dish for observing this repetitive behavioral phenomenon. The extreme right-wing of that eminent tribunal routinely takes the extreme position of following the country’s founding charter, whether it leads to Disney or Camden. In contrast, their opposing faction simply locks the wheel left and produces sententious pap whenever they can muster five votes. So if I only care about the destination and you only care about a check sheet, where do you think we’re going to go?

It goes without saying that when one side is oriented to process and the other results, the eventual winner is so obvious that even Nate Silver could predict it four times out of ten. And that’s the history of our most political branch of government.

Today offered an example so lurid that I couldn’t resist remarking on it. The court decision concerned a legal resident Filipino named James Demaya who is, of course, just as American as any other foreigner who wants to live here. I trust readers will not swoon to learn that Mr. Demaya’s All-Americanness took shape in burglarizing his neighbors. These multiple efforts to just-trying-to-make-a-better-life-for-himself triggered rare activity in what must have been a dusty and cobwebbed deportation hearing chamber. Within which the government’s solicitors argued that his infractions could be characterized as “crimes of violence” by virtue of the fact that violence was visited upon the window pane shattered in furtherance of his illicit entry. That’s actually not a joke.

And as a violent offender-American, Demaya was subject to the hideous and inhuman punishment of being returned to his home country. Some atrocities simply must be said.

Based on varying opinions of precisely what constitutes a violent crime under immigration law, the case eventually percolated up to the Supreme Court, where newly enshrined Justice Gorsuch was perched to cast the deciding vote. Now without needing to be told readers will know that the liberal results-oriented branch of the court needed no testimony beyond Demaya’s country of origin to satisfy their conviction that he remain here. And, contra my assertion of conservative process-groupies, four members of the vague right had formed ranks for the result that he leave. In war, prudent generals contemplate the paperwork after they win the battle.

Well as fortunate for Mr. Demaya as it was unfortunate for their posterity a true conservative jurist rode to the constitutional rescue. Observing the law with an eye untainted by his children’s future, Gorsuch cast the decisive fifth vote with the prog bloc in favor of Filipino burglars, and then the black robes all turned to flit out. As the Washington Post says: Deportation dies in darkness.

But profits definitely prosper in darkness if CEOs are to be believed, so with Demaya set to return to his old burgling grounds we can expect soaring ADT renewal rates. Obviously one can hardly make the claim that immigrants don’t aid the economy.

And this is how honest, well-meaning conservatives lose the future with smiles of smug satisfaction. It is easy to grasp Gorsuch’s logic in this decision. The law is vague and its application of violence in this case was almost laughable. But that really wasn’t the underlying issue. Because if a thousand mile forest grew in one row, only the most simple men would think about a single tree. Imperfect law or not, Demaya should have still been deported. Because that’s the only future destination where we can have the freedom to debate how much of our stuff other people will take. In other cultural destinations that decision is already made.

The point is that America’s future won’t be forged by process, but results. The Court’s left-wing understands this as clearly as men like Gorsuch do not. His four confederates in this case did not vote to overturn the law because it was vague or unconstitutional, but because it did not advance their primary agenda of white disembowelment. The rational counter is not panting Gorsuchian pining for blind lady justice, but rather ruthless prejudice in favor of your own results.

Obviously that isn’t an ideal stance on disentangling the law in a peaceful society. So do conservatives think the left is at peace with them?


33 thoughts on “Conservatism the Hemlock of Conservatives

  1. I guess I am lost here. My understanding of the law is that a legal resident can be deported for a crime that does not involve violent, for example fraud, extortion, theft, impersonating a police office.

    I quite agree with you regarding the gutless wonders that consider themselves to be centrists or conservatives. I spent my youth watching Bill Buckley trash various right wingers while extolling Big Government and refusing to engage in the culture wars. No wonder we have the depraved society we have today because Buckley liked the “cut of Gore Vidal’s gib.”

  2. Pingback: Conservatism the Hemlock of Conservatives | Reaction Times

    • I concur…great to have you back! It’s the immigration version of failing to read someone their Miranda rights even though they murdered someone on national tv at Times square on New year’s eve…

      • That’s what makes cases like these so irresistible to the orderly, conservative mind. A man like Gorsuch knows that if you’re going to preserve Miranda for all, you must preserve it in the most egregious instances.

        So he similarly opines that if you’re going to preserve shelters from deportation for all you’re going to have to preserve them for Filipino burglars. It’s the first premise that’s his (our) problem, not his legal reasoning.

        The left wins (among several reasons) because they don’t accept any premise but their own.

  3. What a low, groveling wretch is American sovereignty–begging for crumbs from 9 inviduals. While trillions are spent securing a military advantage against, for example, Russia, the cheap and easy sovereignty advantage will matter much more.

    It looks like it was the new guy’s turn to cast the deciding ( and ever so suspenseful) vote this time. He can swing conservative the next time and let someone else take the heat.

    Really a brilliant analysis and analogy. It’s great to see another Porter article, despite the fresh hell which inspired it.

  4. Ex CIA Brennan opined about the Kakistocracy in a tweet. Heads were scratched, google word search was a humming, and a word was born. Saw more than a few pundits relish in repeating it.

    I knew the meaning because of this blog. The Kakistocracy is still thriving, and Brennan remains a member in good standing.

    Really enjoy your work. Worried you might have been Seth Riched…….glad you are posting again.

  5. “Imperfect law or not, Demaya should still have been deported.”

    No doubt, but our Constitution actually is a suicide pact. And three generations of imbeciles is not enough.

    Conservatives -we’ll kill non-whites in foreign lands and let non-whites kill us in our own.

    • I like this:

      “No doubt, but our Constitution actually is a suicide pact. And three generations of imbeciles is not enough.”

  6. Why are illegal immigrants granted protection under the constitution? In any other country this would not be a debate. This does not really change anything anyway. I think that was Gorsuch’s mental rationale. And it gave him the opportunity to look like something other than a DJT shoe-in. The most important consequence of this decision is…. it inspired Porter to resurface. Thanks justice gor-such.

  7. Porter, it’s brilliant to see you back ( hopefully?). I’ve been waiting for bloody months.

    On the subject of “process over outcome”, much like their conservative counterparts, the employees of Starbucks followed protocol faithfully and to the letter… prompting their own CEO to throw them under a bus.

    My favourite moment is at 15:27. You know a culture has achieved Maximum Cuck Level when even black trolls begin to openly mock the wrist-slashing masochism.

      • I am certain that this is already a real issue in cuckold and poly “communities”. I have no doubt that you could easily find many such cases.

        Considering the current push on poly degeneracy, I can easily imagine the current articles about “why poly relationships are happier” turning into “your hesitation about your wife’s black boyfriend is white supremacy” in a few short years. No doubt most far left types would already agree with this opinion.

  8. Pingback: This Week In Reaction (2018/04/22) - Social Matter

  9. “Well, at least we got Gorsuch.” This is already proving to be the last digit to be snipped off the middle class hand of the body politic, as whatever hopes the plebes had (by way of a black swan embodied in the Orange Man) to overturn decades of DC corruption, vanishes in a constitutional penumbra and legalistic fog.

  10. Pingback: K Blog: You Didn’t Conserve One Damned Thing | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  11. The only option left to the Citizens will be to ensure that these scurvy bastards are bagged and tagged while in commission of their crimes.

    Of course, that pre-supposes you’re in a Free State and have the ability to defend yourself and your property.

  12. Stepping back a bit, to get a broader view, what we have here is a gigantic institution built on theft, deciding the fate of a small time free lance competitor. Somehow, I get the impression that no matter what choice they made, it would not have been for my benefit. The choices were between “bad” and “worse”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s