One of the more manifestly foolish liberal cliches is the premise that people yearn to be brought together. The notion is fading out of favor in an environment of white demonization, though historically few leftist pols could conclude a speech without promising to bring people together. This was always spoken in implied or explicit counterpoint to the republicans who ostensibly labored to keep people apart.
Unfortunately, republican efforts to keep Tyson plants and chicken helots apart have proved a lavish failure. Though I’m sure it’s the intent that counts. But the point is that liberals insist on bringing people together—whether they want it or not. For instance, Mark Zuckerberg brings people together at his Hawaiian estate by flying them in helicopters over the wall he has constructed around the property.
But I can assure you, Mark’s desire to be brought together with the residents of Sierra Leone’s Kroo Bay slum is entirely atypical. Throughout history people, affluent liberals in particular, have expended extraordinary resources in efforts to not come together with those unlike them. It really is remarkable how quickly men seek to become untogethered once they gain the means to actually wield discretion in the matter. And all it requires is a few minutes on twitter to understand why.
I can’t say I particularly like twitter. As I infer from its stock price, the platform accommodates dozens of users squawking out their browser windows simultaneously. I prefer the aesthetics and intimacy of a blog, but that’s really not where you find a few dozen people. So I periodically read through tweets in the segregated online nation-states that also oddly resist the alleged human yearning for coming together. There’s jew twitter, black twitter, squatter twitter, and obviously preening white lib twitter. None of which require extensive mining to extract an iron certainty that bringing people together who do not like each other is the most malicious idea ever shit out of a prog’s haunches.
There are two points readers here do not need to hear. First, it can not be overstated how much lurid racial animosity resides openly in the realm of love. Second, and perhaps more interestingly, there does not exist even a shared logical premise from which this gulf can be bridged. The tedium of traipsing through the left’s twitter zoo is not being held in contempt—that’s sand in the desert. It is instead in realizing that what many imagine are universal thought processes and rational progressions are actually unique to each faction. As a result, a gerbil and a trout would have more fruitful discussions. This, by the way, is why prudent fish and rodents do not insist on coming together.
I was quickly reaching these conclusions upon reading a twitter thread by some liberal life-ensconced academic who simply could not believe the comical self-contradiction of the following tweet. His claque of dim sycophants joined in the ridicule.
That is quite a lark. I mean what kind of sci-fi scenario would have people be friends and allies without moving in mass into each other’s home? What term would anthropologists even coin for such a bizarre arrangement? A “neighborhood?” I’m just making up words here.
It struck me that the original tweeter and his gaggle of head-bobbers could not even conceive of the very social proposition in which they all actually live. Reality is defenseless against a well-armored narrative. It was, in fact, preposterous by their rationale. If you are a 1) good person, then you 2) adore all alien peoples, thus 3) you move them into your home and 4) have anal sex. There’s an implied logical progression that can only be broken by hate.
Similarly, nationalists can not feasibly have international allies because if you are 1) a bad person, you 2) do not want aliens to take over your home, which means 3) that you hate people who are different, and 4) will try to kill them if they call you on the phone. As such, nationalists—who are very bad people indeed—can not have friendly foreign relations, QE fucking D.
As a result, we learn that the diplomatic meeting shown below between Chinese and Nigerian ministers ended either in torrents of blood, or a 100 million man population transfer accompanied by mass orgies of interracial anal sex.
Anything else is just laughable.