Thinking about the ongoing series of Trans-Atlantic diversity murders, one of the more sobering realizations is that there is no bridge too far. There is no injury, insult, or florid spray of intestines that would catalyze a broad public inflection point. The elasticity of tolerance appears infinite. The outrages, large and small, month by year, hospital by cemetery, leave no lasting impression. Victims and their lives are promptly buried by the media as if no more than a beetle’s dung. While Emmet Till still bathes in sympathy 62 years later. The fact is that there is no “minority” behavior capable of penetrating the modern gospel. There is no MOAB for the liberal mind.
Of course the most flamboyant muslim exercise was the legendary aviation mishaps of 9/11. This being an outrage so unforgivable that its demographic source was punished with ruthless migration increases. If Ahmed had only been astute enough to commence his carnage a generation earlier, he’d likely enjoy an American majority by now. Though it appears the lesson has been earnestly taken to heart in Europe. Massacre after bloodbath, European governments respond to their constituents’ swarthy assailants with gates wider than an empowered woman’s legs.
But *freedom isn’t free, and neither is a North Atlantic caliphate. And so the British government is obliged to not only import and quarter enemy infantry, but to install a massive surveillance infrastructure to keep the Thames merely pink rather than red. And so it was after Manchester, like all its gory predecessors, I read British government promises to bolster its anti-terror force even more while simultaneously unloading plane loads of Levantine reinforcements.
That led me to wonder how many Englishmen bother to peer past their distinguished patrician noses. A man named Sadiq Khan is already vizier of London. What do prim anti-racist Brits think will become of their security apparatus once it is firmly in the hands of colonial Islamic administrators? Does no one wonder about this? Is math, and its electoral manifestations, deemed to Euro-centric for public contemplation? Well I’ve contemplated it in their stead. And what I’ve concluded is that the focus of European “anti-terror” efforts will shift dramatically once they are under the stewardship of non-Europeans.
No matter how counter to one’s ecumenical worldview, the possibility must be considered that muslim political leadership will not primarily target muslims. In fact, I think future white minorities will be astounded at how briskly “anti-terror” efforts pivot toward those more resembling anti-regime, anti-infidel, and anti-apostate. All of which are certainly more terrorizing to a muslim majority than the periodic splattering of despised kafirs.
And yet Westerners maintain the blithe expectation that an alien civilization can be imported to protect them from itself. I am skeptical that any presumption has ever strained against observable reality with more vigor. Though mere lunacy is not nearly sufficient to alter public policy. And neither will be its next macabre result. Most men never learn; they are only learned from. If there’s any Europe left in the ashes of liberalism, there will be no deficit of educational opportunities.
*particularly when it’s defined as the freedom of foreigners to elect American puppets and migrate here in mass when those aren’t found palatable.