Here’s another car in liberalism’s long train of abuses.

Outrage has grown at Walter Reed Middle School in North Hollywood, as the school faces layoffs and increased class sizes due to a law limiting funds for schools with a higher white student body.

The Los Angeles Unified School District provides more funding for schools where the white population is below 30 percent.

In a letter to parents, the district noted the highly regarded middle school had been above the percentage for the past couple years.

So funding is mechanically cut wherever the white student body exceeds 30 percent. I understand the term minority has suffered egregious verbicide, though 30 percent is literally one, and not a plurality either. And so if protecting minorities was always just a ruse, by what logical basis would this figure for funding evisceration not fall to five percent in the future? And once you accept the premise of a few whites being a few too many, why would California permit any public funding for them period? Where you aware that municipalities face no budget cuts or refunds whatsoever when the percentage of taxes paid by whites exceeds 30 percent? How difficult is it to envision the current trajectory toward simultaneous mandates of exclusively white taxation for exclusively non-white funding? Finally, which branch of government would you guess is responsible for this pernicious piece of legislation?

The racial formula was a condition imposed by court decisions dealing with desegregation in the 1970s.

Parents, however, remain frustrated with what the cuts might mean for their children.

Make sure to read that last sentence closely in context. It’s saying that even though a judicial star chamber decreed that whites may not benefit from their own taxes, parents however remain frustrated. What strange parents. Variations of this bizarre rhetorical formulation have been proliferating like a pop starlet’s pubic lice lately. Despite this despicable condition, certain people despise it. I suppose we’ll just have to figure out why without the media’s aid.

Oddly enough, even the intended beneficiaries are becoming flummoxed.

“When your class sizes are getting larger and you’re taking resources away from students, I mean as parents, you do want your kid to go out to college,” one parent, Rosemary Estrada, said.

It’s getting increasingly difficult for the Estradas of the world to navigate America’s racial turf maze. Plainly she came here for our society to make a better life for herself. I mean if she didn’t want to live around whites, a big world awaited. Though now anything over 30% of them results in a worse life–which is the exact opposite expectation of all those Central Americans presently atop north-bound trains.

According to, Walter Reed middle school has the following demographic profile:
47% Hispanic (or white if they commit a felony)
29% White
11% Asian
7% Black

So an overwhelmingly non-white school gets bloodied in the left’s zeal to bomb whites. That’s called unintentional consequences. And it is a corollary of unfunded budgets. Because the Walter Reed district is now going to be desperate to run off its 30% overflow. But 30% parents aren’t entirely sanguine about their children being the only hated gringos in class. And so those with opportunities for mobility will start to take them. That means fewer whites to pay the bills, which means decreased school funding, increased white flight, and the children of people like Rosemary Estrada suddenly attending a more northerly version of the same dump they swarmed over the border to avoid.

It seems finding the proper formula for maintaining a caste of culturally deracinated, politically powerless, social amenity supporting whites is more difficult than solving the Riemann Hypothesis. But this situation will ultimately be less redolent of a conundrum faced by mathematicians than the one faced by King George. Because what is happening in California is so openly offensive to most people’s sense of civic good-faith, that in revolutionary times it would have seamlessly slid into public revulsion as one of the Intolerable Acts. That’s a concept with a future as vivid as its past. Consider the following…

For many parents, the race-based reason of “too many white students” has made the cuts more difficult to swallow.

Difficult to swallow is a euphemism. What these polite minority white parents mean is that such malicious orders are intolerable. Eventually they’ll stop tolerating them.


15 thoughts on “Intolerable

  1. The comments on that piece, for a local LA news site, are incredibly based. Maybe whitey is waking up?

    I’d never heard of this rule before, the White Bonus for driving enough whites out of your school. Hey, we got it below 30%! Good times ahead! Bonuses for all the administrators! It’s really quite fascinating watching your own nation go completely, stark raving mad, in real time.

  2. The glee that is so apparent on the faces of the tarring and feathering gents in the illustration evokes great envy in this reader. Alas, so many candidates for tarring, and so little actual tarring going on…

  3. Pingback: Intolerable | Reaction Times

  4. Pingback: K Blog: Intolerable | Western Rifle Shooters Association

    • It is California’s “Law Enforcement” who enable their “insanity” and treason.

      There is a very effective solution for that.

  5. I had never heard of this vile diktat either; the 30% cut-off is the biggest surprise, especially for 1970. The term ‘minority’ is losing usefulness. Its status is changing from ‘revered and subsidized’ to ‘deservedly crushed by democracy’–South African style.
    It’s pretty horrifying what the media has lulled us into tolerating as opposed to what the Founding Fathers went to war over.
    Teens kicked off United Airlines flight for wearing leggings is a bigger outrage than 2 Miami officers shot in ambush.

  6. What I haven’t been able to ascertain from the articles on this case is why the white population has increased? Is there any actual increase in white students or has the population changed effecting percentages? I would guess there is some gentrification taking place as the Asian population is significant in this school. Are the Hispanics “going back” or are the hipsters and their kids moving in?

  7. Pingback: North Hollywood school faces cuts because of rise in white student population – End Evening Nautical Twilight

  8. Education System Broken: Let’s Try ‘Ed-Exit’ Supporting evil is evil. Conscription, violence, indentured servatude is what j-dem-commies & -republican-fascists both agree on. both agree because they are BOTH MARXISTS. Who owns you? MESSAGE TO POLICE You are responsible for the money you pay to government. the government killed 500,000 iraq children. your money paid for it. 911-1500 architects & engineers prove the twin towers were brought down by controlled demolition Why I dont feel bad anymore? I don’t pay my Stockholm syndrome evil psychopaths in DC & my views have been clearly itimized on google+ among others. good luck, conscription & violence in us is evil

  9. Pingback: Everybody else’s country and no longer Americans’ country | Mojave Desert Patriot

  10. Anyone sending his child to a “public school” is, by definition, an unfit parent and should be be shunned by Aryan society.

  11. Pingback: I Think We Need to Draw Up Some Articles of Intoleration – Daily Pundit

  12. Pingback: This Week In Reaction (2017/04/02) - Social Matter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s