An Honest Day’s Theft

You wouldn’t arrest a law-abiding burglar, would you?

That was the plaintive query of a Times piece today on the DHS’s new immigration enforcement guidelines. Like most articles produced by the Sacred Order of Slim, this one made a point of flaunting its moral flexibility. Which is precisely why you pay to read professionals: cheapo bloggers never produce such artful expedients.

Foremost of these expedients is the often expressed theory that crimes must be stacked in order to trigger law enforcement of any individual ones that may reduce democrat voter roles. If not, all we have is a lawful illegal alien. The concept is similar to a parlay in gambling. In this a Honduran, for instance, has to both illegally enter the country and knock over a liquor store in order to cover his deportation combination bet. Otherwise, he doesn’t win a plane ticket south for either crime. It’s just like if you refuse to serve blacks, you have to also be separately engaged in wire fraud before your restaurant gets shut down. There’s no difference.

But you don’t want to risk me inaccurately characterizing the NYT’s position. So I’ll relinquish the floor.

The new enforcement policies put into practice the language of fear that Mr. Trump offered on the campaign trail, vastly expanding the definition of “criminal aliens” and warning that such unauthorized immigrants “routinely victimize Americans,” disregard the “rule of law and pose a threat” to people in communities across the United States.

The language of fear. Is there a Rosetta Stone for that? Would this language include terms like Nazi! Racist! and random letters appended with phobe. Those sound phonetically like the Language of Fear, but perhaps they’re just Czech. Though Trump’s fluency in foreign tongues isn’t really the point Times writers are trying to make. Here’s the points they are:

Mexicans commit less crime than blacks, so you should want more Mexicans.

Despite those assertions in the new documents, research shows lower levels of crime among immigrants than among native-born Americans.

Did you know that in a population of Pat Boone, Betty White, and Joseph Stalin the addition of Pol Pot would lower the average mass murder rate? So you should want your leader to be Pol Pot.

Immigration laws should be enforced just like civil rights laws: only when logistics readily permit.

the new policies are a rejection of the sometimes more restrained efforts by former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush and their predecessors, who sought to balance protecting the nation’s borders with fiscal, logistical and humanitarian limits on the exercise of laws passed by Congress.

Illegal immigrants are unconscionably inconvenienced by laws against illegal immigration.

Advocates for immigrants warned on Tuesday that the new border control and enforcement directives would create an atmosphere of fear that was likely to drive those in the country illegally deeper into the shadows.

Liberals are meticulous stewards of the taxpayer’s money.

Mr. Trump has not yet said where he will get the billions of dollars needed to pay for thousands of new border control agents, a network of detention facilities to detain unauthorized immigrants and a wall along the entire southern border with Mexico.

Who can even guess where Trump would come up with $54.5 billion dollars per year?

Borders are racist in the Western Hemisphere north of the 30th parallel.

When you tell state and local police that their job is to do immigration enforcement,” said Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, “it translates into the unwarranted and illegal targeting of people because of their race, because of their language, because of the color of their skin.”

Omar Jadwat

Omar Jadwat

You can’t expect Mexico to absorb the migrants Mexico expected to toss on you.

Mexican officials said on Tuesday that such a (repatriation) move could violate Mexican law and international accords governing repatriation, and immigrants’ advocates questioned Mexico’s ability to absorb thousands of Central Americans in detention centers and shelters.

And those are really the only immigration points the New York Times is trying to make.

You wouldn’t just dismiss honest liars, would you?


16 thoughts on “An Honest Day’s Theft

  1. Pingback: An Honest Day’s Theft | Reaction Times

  2. Slim’s parents were (apparently, Maronite Christian) immigrants to Mexico, I’ll assume legal ones. I wonder why Carlos’ parents left Lebanon in the 1940? Let’s see, 1940 Lebanon comes under Vichy French government control. And if he is such a great businessman, why did he buy the NYT? There’s more to this story.

    • Slims father was an immigrant to Mexico the fathers wife was Mexican. Where the trail gets interesting is Carlos married a Lebanese women named Soumaya Domit Gemayel from a very prominent political family.

      Whatever political faction Slim works for and with and what his intentions are are not crystal clear other than you and I should have seen enough by now to label him as Anti-American persona non grata.

      By the way do enough research on Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos and you will see his family was CIA and is just an extension of past CIA technology.

      When it comes to the press you need to think in terms of sliding scale mind control. Download TRANCE Formation Of America by Cathy O’Brien and view the video below and you’ll see what I am talking about

      • I watch the video and agree that physical and sexual abuse make people easier to control. This has been known and employed for thousands of years. However, I’ve never read any solid source that the NSDAP (“nazis”) used those types of tactics. So that bit is bollock.

      • When the government is in charge of investigating the government as was the case of Project MKUltra first brought to public attention in 1975 by the Church Committee of the U.S. Congress we can never be sure. However there is a possible link from CIA mind control programs to Operation Papaerclip (National Socialist Germany).

        “Several secret U.S. government projects grew out of Operation Paperclip. These projects included Project CHATTER (established 1947), and Project BLUEBIRD (established 1950), which was renamed Project ARTICHOKE in 1951. Their purpose was to study mind control, interrogation, behavior modification and related topics.”

      • KeK, I need a name and evidence that the NSDAP had a mind control project using sex or emotional abuse. Wiki (I though we proved their reliability a comment up) and or the kangaroo court of the Nuremberg trials isn’t good enough. In the 19th century there was a lot of research going on in Germany and Austria into criminality (well before the NSDAP even existed). Freud tapped into this. The British government pick up on this and Aleister Crowley began to play. The CIA is an out growth of the OSS which was started by British intelligence. It’s not a coincidence that homosexuals were/are sought out as agents. They tend to move mountains for an alpha heterosexual male in command. I’m happy to revise my thoughts with hard evidence.

      • I can’t give you a name but feel you answered your own question in a general sense. BTW – I find WIKI is mostly more truth than fiction, depending on the subject matter. In the case I cited above pretty damn good.

      • Kek, Just came across this and thought you might be interested. This video looks at the history behind MKUTRA

        the Germans mentioned are jews.

  3. Interesting, Wiki got it wrong, though I’m not suprised: Slim was born on January 28, 1940, in Mexico City,[10] to Julián Slim Haddad (born Khalil Salim Haddad Aglamaz) and Linda Helú Atta, both Maronite Catholics of Lebanese descent.
    I’ll take a look at the video, thanks.
    Just as an aside, many converso from Spain immigrated/fled to the Spanish territory which is today Mexico. And on a personal note, I once had a Maronite Lebanese tell me his father’s jewish Lebanese friend came to him and told him to leave Lebanon just before the Israeli invasion. I took it as the 82′ invasion.

    • I think the converso — or crypto-Jew — element in South America and Mexico is a lot more than is generally understood. Jews are very powerful across much of the Spanish speaking lands to our south. This story, along with their participation in the slave trade, is buried very deep.

  4. “drive those in the country illegally deeper into the shadows”

    Oh yay! The Times dragged out my favorite bit of smarmy Prog agit-prop, the Livin’ in deh Shadows meme! I dunno, around here the Mexers and pretty much out in the sunshine. I live across the street from a park in an ostensibly white neighborhood, yet on any nice day the place is jammed full of tubby Mestizos and their 2, 3, 4 and 5 lard ball children. I keep looking to see if a tiny dark cloud is following them around, like in a cartoon, making sure they stay stuck “in the shadows,” but nope. I have yet to see one. I would guess their “fear” level is somewhere between zero and none.

    But it’s a good phrase. Those poor dears, living “in the shadows.” How many decades now has the Left been using that? You’d think the blade would be dulled by now, but nope.

    Well it will be interesting to see as the weather warms up if the numbers of tubby welfare eaters goes down, now that they’re all scared right out of their burritos and fleeing from the Storm Troopers. Or so I hear.

    • I feel so bad for the Fearful Ones. Maybe they should andele back across the Rio Grande where they will be safe from all those Anglo demons who are making them so escared-o.

  5. “You can’t expect Mexico to absorb the migrants Mexico expected to toss on you.”

    That would be hilarious. Even just 2 or 3 million of the illegals here, plus all of the migrants from all over the world that slip in here through Mexico, all dumped in the Mexican government’s lap with no way of getting to America. Let them deal with the mess they helped create. Closing at least 30 of their 50 something consulates would be great too.

    “Despite those assertions in the new documents, research shows lower levels of crime among immigrants than among native-born Americans.”

    I love that argument. What it leaves out is that all immigrants together might commit crimes at a lower rate than natural born Americans, Mexican illegals commit far more, which is the main point of all this. Also, “natural born Americans” includes some 50 million black people, who commit far more crimes per capita than whites.

    • Yes it’s all statistical legerdemain. Millions of medium crime Mexicans aren’t actually an improvement on low crime whites just because we already suffer a huge cohort of high crime blacks.

      And the thesis is ridiculous beyond that. No prudent man would view his dispossession favorably because crime rates might fall in his people’s absence.

      • Yes, it is ridiculous in many ways. The idea that I should let some foreigner stay in my house simply because they are slightly less likely to kill me or steal my things than some random trailer park occupant is stupid on its face. Of course when your true purpose is dispossessing a people and their children of their wealth and country, you can’t just say it out loud. This leaves you with the unenviable task of constantly having to come up with new lies, which are often easy to poke holes in.

  6. Pingback: This Week in Reaction (2017/02/26) - Social Matter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s