A Government that Serves

Several unmistakable public themes emerged from the primaries through the general election. Trump’s astonishing victory was carried by a wave of populist enthusiasm for an exotic concept of government interested in its own people. For sovereign borders, domestic industry, and a lengthy pause in the Fibonacci war sequence.

For perhaps the first time in a generation it seems Republicans have heard what their constituents have been screaming. And so with those plaintive cries still vibrating their eardrums, the Senate last week–without a murmur of dissent–sprung to the people’s cause in passing a bill to prohibit…anti-semitism. That’s what historians should memorialize about this historical election year. For years members of the scorned white working class have yearned for imprisonment when they vex powerful networked jews. 2016 was the year someone finally listened. Who knows if they’ll get that, but this clarification of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964–which bans discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin by educational institutions that receive federal money–would ensure no unkosher topics ever percolate unpunished on an American campus.

Here’s how democrat co-sponsor Bob Casey described the bill.

A recent FBI crime report notes that 58.2 percent of religiously-motivated hate crimes were due to the offender’s anti-Jewish leanings, and the Anti-Defamation League found that the number of anti-Semitic attacks at colleges and universities doubled in 2015. Currently, the DOE’s Office for Civil Rights has stated they will not tolerate incidents such as these, but has not issued firm guidance on what constitutes anti-Semitism. The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act would codify the definition as one adopted by the U.S. State Department’s Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism.

Plainly congress has taken heed of the public’s temperament. And it’s always gratifying when the bureaucracy’s blind mole rats emerge from their subterranean DC labyrinths to pronounce upon what they “will not tolerate.” It would be even more gratifying to see them try to enforce their demands without the collusion of large armed mercenaries. But at least we can count on receiving accurate agenda-free figures on jewish suffering from the ADL.

So what are these newly codified definitions?

Examples include, among other things:

Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust

Demonizing Israel by blaming it for all inter-religious or political tensions

Judge Israel by a double standard that one would not apply to any other democratic nation

Alright, I’m back. Readers would have had no way of knowing that your host has spent the last eight hours in ICU after suffering a near fatal swoon. This after being dumbstruck by the anvil of irony that jews do not at all appreciate a double-standard in regard to Israel. Once the attending physician has removed my feeding tube, I shall again try to describe the superhuman audacity required to complain of double-standards after a people erect their own remorseless ethno-nationalist state with border walls to Jupiter while their diaspora meticulously (and with interminable moralizing) deconstructs the ethnic core of every western country, including those that supply it with billions in aid and pro bono submarines. If I’m even able to walk to where the local rabbi last painted a swastika, it will be a miracle.

And by the way, I’d keep criticisms of China’s trade policy to yourself if you want to avoid similar anti-asian hate accusations.

Though the essence of the bill is simple. Don’t call for hurting another people, don’t demonize another people, and don’t be hypocritical about another people. And if you do act exactly like jews, that’s ANTI-SEMITISM.

But you don’t have to just listen to me.

The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act is supported by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Federations of North America, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

All kinds of people in jewish advocacy organizations support the bill.

And while a critic might conceivably question the tension between criminalizing things jews don’t care to hear with alleged protections suggested by the First Amendment, there’s really nothing to worry about.

This act is not meant to infringe on any individual right protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution.

Thank Yahweh for that!

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “A Government that Serves

  1. Pingback: A Government that Serves | Reaction Times

  2. If Bill Clinton was the first black president, will Donald Trump be the first Jewish president?

    His favourite child, Ivanka, converted to Orthodox Judaism and is raising her children as such, and her husband Jared Kushner is one of Trump’s closest advisors. Both of Trump’s adult sons, Don Jr. and Eric, are married to Jewish women, meaning that under Jewish law *all* of Trump’s grandchildren are Jews.

    His personal lawyer and consiglieri, Mickey Cohen, and his main speechwriter, Stephen Miller, are both Jews. And rather than being an anti-Semite, as alleged by the (((MSM))), his chief strategist Steve Bannon seems more like a fanatical philo-Semite with his constant use of the bullshit neologism “Judeo-Christian.”

    Trump is undoubtedly the most pro-Israel (or more accurately, pro-Likud) president ever elected. He has promised to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and has green-lighted the building of further Israeli settlements in the West Bank; in both cases reversing decades of bipartisan US policy.

    He’s also threatened to outlaw the BDS movement, and if this blatant assault on free speech known as the “Anti-Semitism Awareness Act” passes Congress and ends up on Trump’s desk, does anyone doubt for a second that he will happily sign it into law? Truly, Hanukkah came early this year for Bibi Netanyahu.

    Before getting too upset about all of this though, consider that there is a method behind the madness here, even if Trump himself doesn’t realize it (though Bannon probably does). Throughout the Western world Jews are being chased out of left-liberal parties by a coalition of Muslims and homegrown anti-Israel activists. This has happened in Britain, France, Australia, and nowhere faster and further than Canada.

    By my reckoning there are 13 ridings (out of 338 in Canada) where Jews–though not a majority–are the decisive voting bloc. In 2004 all these ridings overwhelmingly voted Liberal; by 2011 most voted Conservative. Even in the Liberal blowout of 2015, the two most Jewish ridings in the country voted radically differently than their neighbours: Thornhill was the only riding amongst 40 or so in the Toronto area that the Conservatives won (in a landslide no less), and Mount Royal was the only riding in the entire Montreal region where the Conservatives were even competitive.

    So within the space of a decade, Jews switched from being the most reliable Liberal voting bloc to being the most reliable Conservative one. And, to a lesser extent, this has happened everywhere in the West, with one notable exception: the United States. In 2012 Jews voted for the Democrats 69-30, and in 2016, 71-24.

    The reason why the US is such an outlier is because the American Jewish population is bigger (on a per capita basis), richer and more powerful than in any other Western country, and because the US is the last remaining country (outside Israel) where Jews still outnumber Muslims. So, unlike their European and Canadian counterparts, the all-powerful American Jewish community doesn’t yet sense the existential threat that Muslims pose to their interests and themselves personally.

    But all that’s going to change, and a lot quicker than almost anyone realizes. It’s not that the majority of Jews will suddenly embrace Trump’s populist nationalism. It’s that the Muslim/Leftist reaction to Trump’s blatantly one-sided pro-Israel policies will be so ferocious and “anti-Semitic” (to the world’s most paranoid ethno-religious group) that the majority of Jews will be forced out of the Democratic Party against their own will.

    So Trump can sit back and let the rabidly anti-Israel Left do his work for him, as more and more Jews (and much more importantly, more and more Jewish money and influence) drift over to the GOP. It’s not that the Jews will ever be our friends, it’s that we share the same Islamo-Leftoid enemies, as all but the most anti-white members of their tribe will belatedly come to realize. Stephen Harper proved that it can be done; Trump is merely following in his militantly Zionist footprints.

    • Of course conservative cartwheels over their new nominal jewish allies are never tempered by sufficient contemplation. Jews historically don’t become conservatives to advance conservatism. But rather for conservatism to advance the interests of jews. Those are the type of pals a guy could learn to live without.

      • That sounds plausible in theory, but in practice as large numbers of Jews have migrated over to these conservative parties, we don’t see them cucking any more than usual. In fact if anything we see them somewhat firming up their stance on the all-important immigration issue. If support–even fanatical support–for Israel will lead Jews to support, or at the very least not to oppose, drastic reductions in immigration levels, then that’s a pretty good trade-off IMO.

        Besides, the Jews have no choice in the matter. They’re basically being ethnically cleansed out of the Left and are running to conservatives for protection. We don’t need to offer them a damn thing, but if lip service towards Israel will shut them up about immigration, then why the hell not?

        In other news, my avatar has become a widely circulated HATE meme in the Great White North.

        http://www.dailystormer.com/make-canada-great-again-flyers-cause-massive-butthurt-bonhomme-suspected/

        *preens*

        Eat your hearts out, Pepe and Harambe.

  3. Holy shit. That is one of the most asinine things I’ve ever read in my life. ‘Holding Israel to an unfair double standard’. Im guessing what they really mean is that Israel will continue to be held to a double standard whereby they get to continue doing everything they outwardly condemn, and get to continue to dictate terms to the US and interfere with our affairs and that it will continue to be the highest crime of the land to criticize them.

  4. Something thats always bothered me about this holocaust issue – I don’t doubt that the Nazis killed a bunch of jews. Fine. But why is this so special, when governments this century alone have murdered over 200 million people(nearly all leftist governments, but thats another matter)? The 6 million of so jews allegedly murdered by the Nazis(as with most things, I do question the numbers) are but a drop in the barrel. Stalin killed far more people, as did Mao. Forgotten also are the doings of lesser known people throughout the world. No one speaks of (((Feliks Dzerzinsky’s))) crimes against humanity either. Why is the event that killed jews so much more important than anything else?

    So far as I know, The kulak lobby won’t have me arrested if I deny the land-owning farmer purge in Ukraine never happened. Will the Indian lobby attempt to have me fired from my job as a trail of tears denier?

  5. “This act is not meant to infringe on any individual right protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution.”

    I believe this serves as a “nothing to see here” signal to put judges at peace with their derelictions of duty.

    • Nothing to see here, indeed. Although your first amendment rights were, indeed, infringed upon, it was not their ‘intent’ to infringe upon them, so there really nothing going on here….

  6. @Porter, we *are* talking about different things. Sorry, I should have made it more clear, I’m talking about conservative parties that the majority of Jews have come to support in the last 10 or 15 years, definitely NOT the Republicans. The bulk of US Hebes have yet to be bounced from the Democratic Party, but mark my words, it’s coming.

    The crux of neoconnery (waging pointless wars on behalf of Israel) is pretty much an exclusively American thing because no other nation can project military power anywhere in the world like the US can. When Sarkozy and Cameron came up with their brilliant plan to depose Qadaphee and hand Libya over to ISIS, they had to go cup in hand to Uncle Sam to lead the charge because even Britain and France combined couldn’t pull off that rinky-dink military operation.

    And I’m not sure that the Libyan op qualifies as neoconnery. Was Israel baying for Kuttaffy’s blood at the time, or was it just misguided honky humanitarianism run amok? Syria on the other hand is definitely a neocon thang, part of Israel’s grand strategy to have America destroy the Iranian regime and all its allies. Trump, to his great credit, seems to want no part of this tomfoolery.

    Getting back to the Canadian example, as the massive influx of hostile Muslims, along with their leftist facilitators, made the Jews feel unwelcome in the Liberal Party, along came Jew-worshipper #1 Stephen Harper to ease their passage into the Conservative fold. And because Canada, unlike the US, sends Israel no foreign aid, and the Canadian military (2 tugboats & 3 biplanes) is in no position to unilaterally intervene anywhere, getting the Jews on board was essentially cost-free, outside of some “yay Israel! boo Palestine!” empty rhetoric.

    So now the Conservative Party can more-or-less ignore Jewish whining and lower immigration levels if they want to (and I hope and pray that they do), because what exactly are the Jews going to do about it? Run back to a Liberal Party getting more Islamified and anti-Israel by the day? Good luck with that. The Jews created this Islamo-Leftoid monster that now wants to devour them, so their political options are limited to whatever influence they can muster inside the Conservative Party. Which is hopefully not much.

    • That’s a good comment, and I understand your drift. Though jews unfortunately have a broader palette of immiseration than just military misadventurism. Looking at the arc of American liberalism, its metastization from a white workers movement into one committed to the destruction of white workers has been a thing of near flawlessly executed evil. That’s the sort of cancerous competence I would fear for Canada’s Conservatives.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s