Despite its perch on the deplorable fringe, I’ve come to (perhaps egotistically) view the alt-right as indispensable to any sustainability initiatives in the West. The mainstream right is so co-opted, corrupted, and craven there’s little other source of meaningful dissent than that which percolates up from the springs of Hate.
And thus why it is precisely the left’s primary target.
When a mortal antagonist wields one ruthlessly effective weapon, you can either seek to destroy it or make him choke on it. Failing to do either is fighting machine guns with sling shots. So obviously that’s what conservatives choose.
It’s morbidly amusing to think the left’s entire platform is balanced on the Hate/Racist axis. They simply advance some pernicious issue and declare opposition invalid by virtue of accusation. The subsequent fear of career ruination or imprisonment serve as remarkably compelling tactics of persuasion.
Editor of Austria’s Largest Paper Charged with ‘Hate Speech’ over Migrant Article
On 25 October 2015, Christoph Biro wrote of the masses of migrants who were travelling through the Styrian countryside and remarked on the assaults and property damage committed by migrants, reports Kurier.
Calling the majority of the migrants “testosterone-driven Syrians”, Mr. Biro recounted the multiple reports of migrants carrying out, in his words, “extremely aggressive sexual assaults”.
He also detailed Afghan men had slashed the seats of the trains that were transporting them to Germany because they refused to sit where Christians had previously sat.
The commentary provoked a negative reaction at the time with 37 complaints lodged against Mr. Biro. He took four weeks off from his position at the time, claiming that he had lost perspective and proportion of the situation.
The prosecutor in the Styrian capital of Graz has confirmed they will be seeking charges against Biro for his comments after the case was brought to them by left-wing SOS Mitmensch. The group released a guide for Austrians earlier this year on how to successfully get people tried for hate speech crimes.
No need to inflame the situation by calling migrant sexual assaults “aggressive” when they may have actually been quite tender. Which means the only legal remedy for natives who bristle at watching their ancient nation swarmed by hostile aliens is to sulk…quietly.
A similar occurrence in Holland.
Hate-Crime Trial of Geert Wilders Can Proceed, Dutch Court Says
The trial of Dutch politician Geert Wilders for inciting hate with his comments about the number of Moroccans in the country can proceed.
Wilders can stand trial on the “suspicion of insulting a group of people based on race and inciting discrimination and hatred,” a Dutch court said Friday. Wilders’ lawyer asked the court to halt prosecution in September, claiming that a judge cannot decide on statements made in a political context. The first hearing in the trial took place on March 18.
Other European court decisions show that members of parliament on the one hand should have a broad freedom to express themselves,” the court said in a statement. Still, politicians have a duty “to prevent making public announcements that feed intolerance.” The court said it’s up to the judge to decide where those boundaries lie.
See, this is why judicial appointments are so critical. They require that rare stock of jurists who have the exquisite discernment to separate peoples’ “broad freedom to express themselves” from “announcements that feed intolerance.” Perhaps that freedom isn’t broad at all when it comes into conflict with a judge’s personal sentiments. I mean if I were presiding, Heidi Beirich would be in the clink for feeding intolerance the moment her massive fleshy pillars sank into Dutch soil. That’s not my preference, it’s just the law. I’m only here to decide where the boundaries lie.
From these fang-bearing displays by the left, conservatives learn nothing.
Alinsky was an incorrigible enemy, but his well-disseminated tactics were wildly successful. Here’s one the right ignores devoutly.
RULE 4: Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
The left is built on a mountain of contradictions. None of which are ever pressed against each other. Fire every anti-white social commenter for racism. Prosecute every interracial attack as a hate crime. Take apart affirmative action as offensive to the liberal principle of anti-racism. Or alternatively, force the Ivy League, the Supreme Court, the Federal Reserve Board, and the NBA to grant admission based strictly on each demographic group’s percentage of the population. Then notice how enthusiastic the country’s kosher two percent remains about the “looks like America” requirement it has so long supported.
And while conservatives are lost on these concepts, The Thing is not.
George Soros’ quiet overhaul of the U.S. justice system
While America’s political kingmakers inject their millions into high-profile presidential and congressional contests, Democratic mega-donor George Soros has directed his wealth into an under-the-radar 2016 campaign to advance one of the progressive movement’s core goals — reshaping the American justice system.
The billionaire financier has channeled more than $3 million into seven local district-attorney campaigns in six states over the past year — a sum that exceeds the total spent on the 2016 presidential campaign by all but a handful of rival super-donors.
His money has supported African-American and Hispanic candidates for these powerful local roles, all of whom ran on platforms sharing major goals of Soros’, like reducing racial disparities in sentencing and directing some drug offenders to diversion programs instead of to trial. It is by far the most tangible action in a progressive push to find, prepare and finance criminal justice reform-oriented candidates for jobs that have been held by longtime incumbents and serve as pipelines to the federal courts — and it has inspired fury among opponents angry about the outside influence in local elections.
“The prosecutor exercises the greatest discretion and power in the system. It is so important,” said Andrea Dew Steele, president of Emerge America, a candidate-training organization for Democratic women. “There’s been a confluence of events in the past couple years and all of the sudden, the progressive community is waking up to this.”
Soros knows that people decide the law we actually live under, not parchment. He knows demographics are determinative. He knows that DAs largely decide who will absorb the state’s prosecutorial wrath. And he wants blacks and hispanics dishing it out. You’ll note the absence of public condemnation about Clinton’s moral infirmities. This is a creature focused on grinding enemies rather than stroking his values. The distinction is existential.
The difference between grasping the gritty machinations of men as opposed to watching a ballet of angels is what separates the alt-right from conservatism. Thank God for the clarity of Hate.