The Butterfly Wings of 9/11

It was a day just like this one. An impossibly bright sun hanging low in a brilliant azure sky. One of those days that makes you wish summer and fall would declare an armistice and leave the weather in perfect stalemate.

15 years will sneak up on even the most vigilant. It was that long ago when a world watched stupefied as two of America’s most conspicuous architectural symbols disintegrated into dust. It’s morbidly fascinating how much of the West those towers have dragged down with them.

9/11 was the bar mitzvah for neocon interventionism. Of course America has never been reticent about minding other people’s business, but in the empty expanse of GWB’s brain the neocons found their global ambitions for once wholly unimpeded.

I doubt most people, even in hindsight, would begrudge a punitive Afghan expedition in the red glow of rage after 9/11. Though with counselors’ urging, buttressed by his own naive universalism, Bush commenced the nation building he had explicitly denounced while campaigning a year earlier.

Obviously that nation building didn’t stop in Kandahar. In 2003, the US went on to invade Iraq for some reason. And after subduing that country with standard military ordnance, the pentagon proceeded to bomb the place with American dollars and blood for the next decade. Unsurprisingly the natives were able to weather this second assault far more capably than the first.

Though their new martial prowess made less impression on Washington than it did on the little people suffering for it. During Bush’s second term, popular support for the Iraq adventure began to wane dramatically–not that decision makers were much interested in hearing feedback. Every debacle was simply another reason to pour more lives and money into the foreign funnel–or else the terrorists will have won!

By the 2008 election cycle, Bush (and by extension his party) were so reviled by the electorate that Democrats could have run a bisexual muslim mullato married to a black-power wookie and still won. So they did.

In this direct line of events, Obama was–fitting to his legacy–elected by a foreign amateur pilot.

image

Ultimately that election has put the whole of Western civilization in mortal jeopardy. And if that was his aim in striking the tower, then Mr. Atta was a visionary pilot indeed.

In addition to metaphorically flattening America’s border defenses, Obama has bombed Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, and Syria. All of which have responded by disgorging retaliatory migrant waves upon the West.

Prior to being deposed and executed, Libya’s Kwuedaffy predicted precisely the Africa-to-Italy freeway that would materialize in his absence. Apparently Obama and European leaders took that as more incentive than threat. Because without any apparent consideration of the consequences, Mommar was promptly no-mar.

If any American or European leaders gave a moment’s thought to his warning, they certainly didn’t allow it to dissuade them from an immediate pivot toward “regime change” in Syria. That Assad wasn’t enthused about following in the very brief footsteps of previously changed regimes only meant he was even more malign than we imagined. So the peace prize prez began reloading his pistol.

The defense industry was eagerly gearing-up to bring freedom and democracy to more Middle Eastern rubble when Putin outfoxed the senile John Kerry, thus averting more bombing sorties, though not a US proxy ground war.

The results of this customarily perpetual conflict have certainly had a symmetry with its costs: countless dollars spent on foreign wars, and countless foreign migrants to show for it. That’s an effective return on investment.

Perhaps nowhere have Obama’s actions been more effective than in Sweden. A country that vaingloriously offered permanent residence to the population of Syria. It was these first lavish signals of virtue that lit traffic lights green across the third world. Whether escaping the Syrian war in Eritrea or the Syrian war in Tajikistan, Sweden’s beautiful oblivious blondes were open for desecration. So the Syrians came…from everywhere.

And instead of the first waves being turned away, Merkel invited them in to Germany. Then she invited them in to Germany’s neighbors–as any good neighbor would do. And seeing only welcome signs, the Earth’s latrines began to empty out.

Now a man can nearly walk across the Mediterranean on the heads of bobbing Africans. Because Sweden and Merkel threw open their doors, because of a war in Syria, because of something called a “Barack Obama” in the White House, because GWB shit away his presidency in Iraq, because on a clear beautiful day, just like this one, two gleaming towers disintegrated into dust.

23 thoughts on “The Butterfly Wings of 9/11

  1. I doubt most people, even in hindsight, would begrudge a punitive Afghan expedition in the red glow of rage after 9/11.

    The wise and the just thing to do would have been to acknowledge the error of our ways in the Middle East and to accept Bin Laden’s very reasonable peace offering.

    We ended up complying with two of his three conditions anyway, the second in about as bloody and wasteful fashion as is imaginable. The third condition, relating to the root cause of all these spin off conflicts, remains the third rail of American politics. (Or is second only to “immigration” for that distinction.)

      • Ack!

        And THAT should instead read:

        That should have been stated as:

        “…accept Bin Laden’s very REASONABLE peace offer (that is, his peace conditions, which were reasonable).”

  2. Reblogged this on The way I see things … and commented:
    “Now a man can nearly walk across the Mediterranean on the heads of bobbing Africans. Because Sweden and Merkel threw open their doors, because of a war in Syria, because of something called a “Barack Obama” in the White House, because GWB shit away his presidency in Iraq, because on a clear beautiful day, just like this one, two gleaming towers disintegrated into dust.”

  3. Pingback: The Butterfly Wings of 9/11 | Reaction Times

  4. The blueprints for the past fifteen years were drawn up well before the twin towers and building 7 had their strange–or at least questionable–structural failures. Far from a plan to protect the territorial integrity of the US and Europe from foreign attack, the long-term plan is to corrode it from within so that it finally crumbles and falls much like building seven, perhaps helped along by a “spontaneous” episode of civil unrest or worse.

    The fabled Silent Majority became autistic quite some time ago, but the “alt-right” seems to be giving it a voice once more. Sadly, in large measure it’s still locked in a room while funny-money-backed media outlets continue to bark out their masters’ voice. Unless and until the money and media issues are favorably resolved in the interests of the citizenry of nations in danger of extinction, secondary issues will amount to noth8ing more than sound and fury signifying nothing.

    • You’re not stupid, but you’re being stupid.

      They don’t “plan” anything but profits and votes. No one wants to destroy their country deliberately.

      It’s that they, like the ait-right, are refusing to understand that when you double a billion people in under 50 years, you get desperate mass-migration.

      This is the same population myopia that’s obtained since Malthus first published. In spite of our retirement plans, we are creatures of the now. If it’s this way now, it’s obviously always been this way and always will be.

      This cognitive bias can’t be overcome. And it alone is damning us more than anything else.

      • I “destroy” the food on my plate deliberately. And groups that see a country as a meal do the same thing to those countries.

  5. We should have lobbed 100 nuclear weapons at every place in Afghanistan Osama might be and call it a day. No one would ever fuck with us again.

    Two people had explanations for what to do and why this happened: the neoconservatives (whose counsel was biased in favor of their coreligionists and dubiously utopian notions of democracy) and the isolationists (who were right, and who still were on board with a punitive raid). GWB chose wrong, which was forgivable, but he doubled down long after it was obviously wrong, all the way up to the overrated surge.

    • Two people had explanations for what to do and why this happened:

      To know why it happened was easy. It only took listening to those who did it.

      Their voices were systematically suppressed or distorted by the media worse than George Zimmerman’s. The neocons knew, consciously or subconsciously, which is why they were so hysterical and so avidly suppressed the truth – What if the American people discovered, as a result of 9/11, who had put their lives at risk?

      The isolationists were only half right. They were too brainwashed by neocon institutions or too cowardly to embrace the fact that what happened was a legitimate act of self defense. Only by doing so could we have walked the only sensible pathway toward peace and safety.

  6. Porter, as much as I appreciate your almost poetic commentary, I do wish that you would not sacrifice function on that altar of poetry and political correctness in not naming the jew. This 9/11 post in point.

    Here’s a straightforward and simple explanation as to why Organized jewry did 9/11.

    The Basics

    When any crime is committed the most important thing is obviously to find out who did it. How the crime was committed and why it was committed are usually secondary issues unless those aspects are critical in determining who did the crime.

    With 9/11 the “Who did it” part can be easily figured out by looking at only “one event” that occurred that day. That “one event” is the method used in the destruction of the World Trade Center’s twin towers, WTC 1 (north tower) and WTC 2 (south tower) . We can also include the destruction of WTC 7 as part of that.

    The official story that these three buildings were destroyed by the consequences of aircraft hitting two of the buildings is childish in the extreme for anyone not mesmerized by “authority figure” pronouncements.

    It should be obvious to anyone with average intelligence and commonsense that the buildings were brought down by some form of controlled demolition. Look at the pictures and look at the videos. There are also over 2,600 architects and engineers who have stepped forward and risked their careers and reputations by defying the official story and going public in supporting this commonsense view.

    Once you understand that some form of controlled demolition was carried out on the twin towers on 9/11, then that is basically all you really need to know about the events of that day. The reason I say that is because the ONLY group of people capable of carrying out a controlled demolition of those buildings and subsequently covering up that crime, MUST be a group that is IN CONTROL of the US government and the media.

    Any honest and informed person of politics will of course understand that the US government is, behind the scenes, fully controlled by ORGANIZED JEWRY. The politicians on both sides are mere puppets taking turns to do the bidding of organized jewry and those non-jews (shabbos goys) that have been co-opted.

    Now, there are several other roads one can take about 9/11 that will lead to the same conclusion.

    But the “controlled demolition road” is very simple and obvious, so I would recommend that.

    We do not really need to know any of the details of that event, for example, what kind of explosives, whether there were planes or not, whether they were remotely controlled or how they were piloted, how many “terrorists” were involved, what happened at the Pentagon, what happened at Shanksville, and so on, ad nauseum.

    All we essentially need to know about 9/11 is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and that the only group capable of carrying out that and the subsequent cover-up, has to be in control of the US government: in other words, ORGANIZED JEWRY!

    Why did ORGANIZED JEWRY carry out 9/11?

    It was to create the pretext, a new “Pearl Harbor” in their words, to launch The War OF Terror against the rest of the world, starting with the Middle East, but eventually expanding to include anyone or any entity that opposes the establishment of a world tyranny known as the Jew World Order.

      • Well, it’s your lucky day Porter and you should make the most of it!

        Seriously though, you’re fortunately no philosemite.

        What caused my indignant outburst was that your post on the 15th anniversary of 9/11 fails to mention who was responsible for it. As a consolation prize you do go into how the jews exploited it and so on.

    • “Once you understand that some form of controlled demolition was carried out on the twin towers on 9/11, then that is basically all you really need to know about the events of that day.” No, it isn’t. That is yet more speculation about the how. It is the why that matters. It doesn’t surprise me that you’ve left this out. It’s always left out. I say “always,” because I have yet to see a well laid out and plausible argument for why anyone should have gone to so much trouble, incurring enormous risk and expense, to collapse the buildings. Can you point me to such an argument? It’s the strangest thing, but in the welter of fine-grained to the point of tedium arguments on the physical properties of steel, no one pauses to consider the motives for the crime of bringing tons of asbestos and concrete down on the heads of New Yorkers. What was the point? What did it achieve?

      • I have yet to see a well laid out and plausible argument for why anyone should have gone to so much trouble, incurring enormous risk and expense, to collapse the buildings.

        Those privileged to issue a state’s currency in the form of a debt own, de facto the sources of prosecutorial risk. And they may ameliorate expense by issuing more currency.

      • What was the point? What did it achieve?

        It justified a war whose real purpose was to prepare swaths of the Middle East for occupation and exploitation by our greatest ally, and eliminate governments at cross purposes with international banking cartels. Race replacement in formerly white nations is a secondary benefit.

      • “It’s the strangest thing, but in the welter of fine-grained to the point of tedium arguments on the physical properties of steel, no one pauses to consider the motives for the crime of bringing tons of asbestos and concrete down on the heads of New Yorkers. What was the point? What did it achieve?”

        The neo-cons wrote that a new “Pearl Harbor” was what would be required to get Americans behind their imperial plans, aka, a War OF Terror, that would be launched after the 9/11 event.

        So they needed a spectacle, something dramatic that would create a lasting impression in the minds of the world. Having what were once the two tallest buildings in the world turned into pile of twisted steel and pulverized concrete in a matter of seconds would provide that very necessary spectacle. That’s why.

        Depending on who’s counting, organized jewry has since then killed a couple of million people in their Middle East slaughter fest, launched the invasion of Europe, etc., so raining asbestos and concrete down on the heads of New Yorkers would probably just raise a chuckle out of these psychopaths.

  7. Pingback: This Week in Reaction (2016/09/18) - Social Matter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s