The Jungle is a Choice

I was reading yesterday about the ongoing violence and chaos at the Calais Jungle. What I did not read was an article about a French military deployment to capture and deport every migrant in this foreign tumor. Why I have not yet read such an article has many reasons, though here is a brief summary of what I did read.

Carnage in Calais: Horrific crash as jungle migrant gangs target tourists in cars in terrifying new AMBUSH technique that left our journalists covered in blood after narrowly escaping death.

* Ruthless gangs deliberately causing crashes on the roads to the French port by hurling large objects at cars.

* Home Secretary Amber Rudd has spoken out after a team of journalists narrowly escaped death last week.

* Reporter Ben Ellery and photographers Steve Burton and John McLellan were all injured.

* They had been investigating a shocking explosion of violence at the squalid migrant camp.

Here are some photos, not from Kinshasa, but its trailing western shadow.








Given their profession’s hatred for traditional Europe, bloodied journalists are typically something a guy can only ask for at Christmas. Though we’ll set that aside and pretend it’s veterinarians at issue.

It amazes to realize that Europeans driving domestic highways are subject to ambush and attack by an open base of the un-French foreign legion. And the state simply grins.

The French will elect Front National, or they will have no cause for complaint when ‘The Jungle’ is that area of land between the English Channel and Mediterranean Sea. Eventually a people either choose to live or stop deserving to.

But in reflecting on those photos, one thought kept repeating…

You know, we don’t actually have to live like this. Nothing beyond our own fanatical masochism forces us to endure being robbed, raped, assaulted, and parasitized. There is no moral mandate from Earth or heaven that we abase ourselves before feral aliens who despise and harm us. We could live normal lives.

Normal in both body and mind. We really don’t have to poke needles in our eyes whenever they see something others demand they not. Nothing makes us censor our own thoughts and scrutinize every word for an ever-expanding catalogue of contrived ‘isms. We could–we should–be able to observe our environment freely, and freely discuss what we observe.

There is no nobility in being browbeaten and brutalized. Being enlightened doesn’t mean barring your neck. And if it does, there will soon enough be no enlightened men. Lying supine in the soil as foreigners stamp tread marks on our face makes us less human, not more. Rather than another fragile tribe of man, we have come to see ourselves as vessels of virtue and our finite habitat as baptismal font–into which the world may be poured. If there is a God, he surely didn’t mean for us to presume his role.

That role includes offering others food and fecundity in lieu of our own family needs. We work and pay taxes to subsidize foreign reproduction in our stead. This process has a predictable end-point.

Universalist altruism is a moral luxury, but those who think they can afford it should understand no people do good from the grave. Whether liberal or conservative, everything in the world you cherish requires someone like you alive to defend it. We can continue rolling our heads down the demographic temple steps, though we shouldn’t be surprised when the gods remain impassive to the display.

Just because the seething, incompetent third-world lives by the principle of If they build it, we will come does not mean we must oblige them. We have a debt to our sons and daughters, not theirs. And our children are not born to be their valets.

European peoples have been far from perfect, as tongues wag daily to remind. But when brown feet vote on whose countries are closest to perfection, the global results are always unanimous. We should remember which of their body parts are telling the truth.

And the truth is that Western civilization is a gift paid for with the inspiration, sweat, and blood of our fathers. It exists so their posterity would never have to live like this.


30 thoughts on “The Jungle is a Choice

  1. Pingback: The Jungle is a Choice | Reaction Times

  2. What I did not read was an article about a French military deployment to capture and deport every migrant in this foreign tumor.

    Are you crazy? What would happen if Putin invaded France while the army were busy clearing out the Calais jungle?

  3. I’m still mystified as to why ANY of the European countries in question-France,Germany,Sweden,England etc -have -as of yet-STILL not turned out the traitorous permanent political&media classes on their collective @$$es….at SOME level you’d think SOMEONE would also being a bit of “direct action” against both the invasion AND their entrenched Enablers…. Paging Vlad,Jan and Martel!

  4. I don’t know, Porter. The time for “we could live normal lives” is well in the future, even if extreme measures were taken. The chess moves get murky beyond 2 or 3 turns, but it goes something like this:
    French grow balls and start kicking these folks out, but it requires a level of violence that westerners are uncomfortable with, and which rouses the banlieues.
    Banlieues are aflame and lots of cars get burnt.
    French Left actually join in the political attack on the government.
    Cucked prime ministers in London, Berlin and Stockholm publicly rebuke the French in an unsubtle wink to their own hordes “we won’t fuck with your clitorectomies if you won’t fuck with our buses and trains”
    You get the picture.

    I would hope that Le Pen would have the steel to see it through, but power and stability are bewitching, especially for women. Either way, the path to what was once normal is becoming narrower and longer each day.

    • Not an implausible scenario you stated. But, regardless of what the other EU nations do to placate their MENA hordes, it will never be enough. Nothing other than complete submission will do.

      And porter, this is a great piece. And although of course you can put whatever the hell you want for your tag line on the top of the page of your site, I thought ‘striving for a flattering eulogy’ suited your writing style and theme of this place much better.

  5. Bigot, reader, and farmer: thanks guys, I appreciate it.

    DNP: I don’t disagree, we’ve excavated quite ditch for ourselves. Though it’s still all very attainable, particularly in light of historical precedent. There will certainly be conflict, but conflict is now a given in our petri-dish countries. The highest hurdle is in the mind.

  6. Porter

    I wrote an email to Western Rifle Shooters Association telling them about your writing, and they just posted your essay “Fundamentals Matter.”

    I’m trying to get you more widely read.

  7. I blame feminism and the feminization of men. The cultural marxists sure as hell did a great job convincing us all to hate ourselves and to hate the male instinct to protect.

    Personally, this is one more reason to leave NATO. If the Russians attacked Europe we’d be fighting on the wrong side. France can only hope Putin invades.

  8. “Eventually a people either choose to live or stop deserving to.”

    That’s a great line and I think that at the moment, the Liberals in Europe do not feel sufficiently threatened by mass immigration. Until most of these people are directly threatened, open borders policy will persist.

    • A Dutch motorcyclist died in the crash, though the Guardian could find little column space to mourn his loss.

      I expect in the film portrayal he will be named Sayed Al Sadr, who was trying to cross the channel to deliver his cancer-cure to Cambridge, though tragically fell prey to a mad-max style caravan of hooded French klansmen, who carved a fatal swastika into his chest before tossing the cure into a bonfire.

      Based on a true story.

    • Gotta love that title, migrants are “forced” to use smugglers, huh? Staying in their own country, or the first ‘safe haven’ they reach(like Turkey) isn’t an option I guess. Funny, the more I read in MSM publications about the alleged plight of these people, the less I care. If we have gotten to the point where merely enforcing what amounts to property rights in a national level is considered bad or evil, it’s time for a reexamination of priorities.

  9. Pingback: The Jungle is a Choice, by Porter | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  10. Kaganovitch: Thanks, that’s very generous. Powell and Raspail saw the future through a pinhole. We have the advantage of watching it take out the walls.

    Gator: I kind of agree with you on the tagline. If no inspiration strikes, I may change it back.

  11. Pingback: Lightning Round – 2016/09/08 | Free Northerner

  12. Back in 1961, American political thinker James Burnham wrote of Liberalism as the ideology of Western suicide. His key idea, that Liberals –and of course this must mean White or Whitish–, when they are faced with any group that they consider less well off than themselves, are morally disarmed. They cede complete moral power to this “disadvantaged” or “oppressed” group, no matter how lethal or bloodthirsty. For them, Being Seen As Good is more important than life itself.

    It continues to anger and astonish me that neither Europeans nor Americans have even suggested that their borders be defended by armed force, by guns and bullets and blood. Why should the Third World stop coming, when The Camp Of The Saints is being played out in real time?

    It is the most astonishing civilizational suicide in history.

  13. But the guilt is a result of manipulation by outsiders, so it’s not really suicide. As MacDonald says in What Makes Western Culture Unique:

    Once Europeans were convinced that their own people were morally bankrupt, any and all means of punishment should be used against their own people. Rather than see other Europeans as part of an encompassing ethnic and tribal community, fellow Europeans were seen as morally blameworthy and the appropriate target of altruistic punishment. For Westerners, morality is individualistic—violations of communal norms by free riders are punished by altruistic aggression.

    On the other hand, group strategies deriving from collectivist cultures, such as Judaism, are immune to such a maneuver because kinship and group ties come first. Morality is particularistic—whatever is good for the group. There is no tradition of altruistic punishment because the evolutionary history of these groups centers around cooperation of close kin, not strangers.

    The best strategy to destroy Europeans, therefore, is to convince the Europeans of their own moral bankruptcy. A major theme of my book, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements,71is that this is exactly what Jewish intellectual movements have done.

    • I agree. An example of why it isn’t suicide is National Socialist Germany. Germany was a perverted hellhole under the (((Wiemar*))) regime. Pregnant women were selling themselves on the street corners. Then the NSDAP took over and in a very short time there was a complete reversal. This would not have happened if the people were doing it to themselves, attempting suicide.

      *Jews played an important role in the first
      cabinet formed after the 1918 revolution (Hugo Hasse and Otto Landesberg),
      the Weimar Constitution was drafted by a Jew (Hugo Pruess), and Jews were
      conspicuously present in the abortive attempts to create radical revolutionary
      regimes, especially in Bavaria. The revolutionary government in Munich was
      headed by a Jewish intellectual, Kurt Eisner, and after his assassination, two
      other Jewish leaders, Gustav Landauer and Eugen Levine, assumed positions
      of major influence in the “Raterepublik” (“Soviet” Republic”). Rosa Luxemburg,
      who was also assassinated, was a leader of the revolutionary Spartakusbund,
      which was one of the predecessors of the German Communist party.
      In the following years as well, Jews held major political posts, primarily in the
      leadership of the democratic and socialist parties. The most prominent Jewish
      Political figure was Walther Rathenau, who served first as minister for
      economic affairs and then as foreign minister. and sorry you have to sign in (when I first viewed this signing in wasn’t necessary) but it is very interesting.

  14. I really like this blog tremendously. I’ve been really turned off by some parts of the alt-right lately: in-fighting, discussing who’s in and who’s out, constant moaning about Jews, bitching about people who are alt-light, etc. I like how you avoid all of this nonsense and just focus on what the problem is and how it could actually, quite easily, be fixed. Kudos.

    • I may have missed it, but what was that easy fix you say Porter mentioned? Porter’s writing to me suggest a far greater depth of understanding than an easy fix would imply.

  15. Pingback: This Week in Reaction (2016/09/11) - Social Matter

  16. Pingback: The Very Best of Last Week in Reaction (2016/09/11) – The Reactivity Place

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s