I was reading a long article at DM on the Tunisian beach massacre. In it a young (presumably) Carthaginian, still suffering legacy effects from the Third Punic War, set about methodically slaughtering European tourists. Witnesses report that the assailant was quite selective in target aquisition–almost as if he were making choices from the back of a church.
He was laughing and joking around, like a normal guy,’ said one witness. ‘He was choosing who to shoot. Some people, he was saying to them ‘you go away’. He was choosing tourists, British, French.’
So British and French people were targeted specifically, while others were encouraged to partir while the partiring was good. Interesting. Do you think that means the intent was to kill British guys like this?

Or British guys like these?

No, I don’t either. But intent remains only conjecture as I could find the word ‘racist’ nowhere in the article. Though, in total, 38 souls were returned to their maker by a muslim fanatic.
Below you will find the animating symbol of this attack:

And following is the number of national elected officials who have immediately called for its removal in the West:

From a political perspective, one may thus surmise that #NotAllLivesMatter. And that wouldn’t be unusual, as people’s radius of applicable stewardship is necessarily finite. For example, I largely absolve Laotian President Choummaly Sayasone of any responsibility for defending my life or its interests. The issue though becomes far more acute when his graceful indifference is actually exceeded by the very domestic politicians and apparatchiks under my own civic employ.
Here’s why that’s a problem.

And it’s a particularly egregious problem when French tourists don’t even need to leave home to have their decapitated heads mounted on a fence post.
The victim’s headless corpse was found next to the vehicle. A knife was also found close by. In an area outside the range of the surveillance camera, the head was attached to the fence framed by two flags with Islamic professions of faith.
So another “headless body in spotless car” headline huh? Well if any pols were interested, those French heads would tend to stay more firmly attached in the absence of Islamic professions of faith. Though is Hollande supposed to just peremptorily cease the ongoing invasion of his country just to save a few frogs? Not until the muslims start waving confederate flags he won’t.
Though returning to the red sands of Tunisia, the DM report included one expression of particular poignancy. A terrified twenty-two year-old survivor, Ellie Makin, reported from her hotel room…
We don’t want to stay in here. We just want to get home now, right now. I want to go home.
Home. Yes, it’s critical to our psychic health and general well-being to have one of those. I’m certain young Ms. Makin is a dutiful and tolerant liberal not yet sufficiently seasoned to logically expand on her sentiment. Though one day, at least subconsciously, she will.
Home is not just geography. Home is a place of comfort, safety, and familiarity. Of mutual trust and understanding. Of common past and shared future. Home is where children play without fear in a parent’s eyes. Home is where speaking honestly offends no shrill aliens. Home is what is passed from your father to your son. And most importantly, home belongs uniquely to you.
There are great swaths of her country now no more Ms. Makin’s home than the violent North African city she longs to escape. And when those swaths broaden to encompass everything, where will her daughter seek sanctuary upon saying…
I want to go home.
?
Great piece. And to think that if this Tunisian mass murderer had set out for Europe in one of the “migrant boats”, he’d be picked up by a “rescue mission” before he got fifty miles out to sea, and could then look forward to being supported for life on the sweat of European brows. Far from trying to protect their people, Europe’s rulers are trying to bring the danger closer to home. Bringing the mountain to Muhammad, as it were.
The young lass probably made a decision to not have children, a lá this kook http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/22/prof-i-chose-not-to-have-children-because-theyd-be-white/
#illswimwithyou
Another great piece. I’m thoroughly enjoying this blog as a refuge for the mind. I always found it peculiar that otherwise intelligent white people would choose to experience a relaxing vacation in some of the most volatile, dangerous geographic locations filled with people that have nothing but contempt if not overt hostility toward them.
I wonder if Ms. Makin’s recent cultural enrichment session has altered her views on the nature of our more “vibrant” counterparts.
If watching your countrymen being slaughtered like lambs on the beach is not enough to get your to re-evaluate your position on vibrancy, nothing short of your head winding up on a post next to a Frenchman’s will.
According to a follow-up report on the massacre, there were 20 000 British tourists in Tunisia when it happened.
Thanks and welcome. I vacationed in an essentially 100% diverse Caribbean island once many years ago. I had a good time, but the hostility of the natives was poorly veiled behind painted-on smiles. After some reflection upon returning home I knew there would never be a reprise.
Nice way to justify pogroms.
#ThatsWhatSeparateCountriesAreFor
Rotherham is a good place to start.
Though it would be intriguing to learn that the same people who infamously offered the Pied Noirs “the suitcase or the coffin” are in fact adamantly opposed to pogroms.
Porter, I’m going to repeat something I told you a while back, which was told me by a Syrian Christian about living in Aleppo, the city of his birth, his people, and his ancestors: “It was like living in a big family house.”
And they lost their home, just as we are losing ours.
That’s home, my friend.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/27/us/scotus-same-sex-marriage-gay-culture.html?_r=2
Meanwhile at home, Andrew Sullivan wonders:
“What do gay men have in common when they don’t have oppression?” asked Andrew Sullivan, one of the intellectual architects of the marriage movement. “I don’t know the answer to that yet.”
Show of hands, please.
HIV. Mustaches. Farts that don’t go “pbpbpbpbpt”.
Clearly he just needs to talk to Grace Dunham.
It has moved over into the surreal. British people are slaughtered like dogs, and here’s what Cameron is concerned about.
That’s offensive to the people slaughtering you! That has to find a place in the Chinese museum exhibit. Dave’s a patriot to the end.
The multiculturalists have succeeded in tainting the concept of a true home, of a healthy monoracial environment. It’s depicted as being synonymous with dullness and mediocrity, despite the fact that all the great achievements of our civilisation came about when we had racially homogeneous countries, and didn’t need news of a fresh sexual perversion every six months to keep us entertained. Martin Amis is typical of that attitude. He says the lack of diversity he experienced growing up in the 50s and 60s was “the only serious deprivation of my childhood – the awful human colourlessness of South Wales, the dully flickering whites and greys, like a Pathé newsreel, like an ethnic Great Depression”.
Angola would offer an ideal color kaleidoscope
“In it a young (presumably) Carthaginian, still suffering legacy effects from the Third Punic War…”
LOL
That’s gold, Jerry. Gold!
“#ThatsWhatSeparateCountriesAreFor”
America is not a separate country–it is home to a plethora of races, ethnicities, and religions. Never has been, never will be. #FoolishToThinkOtherwise
Pingback: Going home « Jim’s Blog
Pingback: Going home | Neoreactive
Pingback: This Week in Reaction (2015/07/19) | The Reactivity Place