I don’t customarily succumb to the carby temptation of copy pasta. You visit here for original content baked in the black bowels of Hate. Though I’m going to stray from tradition to feature a post from The BotB. My own comments will follow in conclusion.
The Rise of a Dissident Party
I predict this will happen. It will be bigger and stronger than previous third parties. The Dissident Party will swear no allegiance to the current Narrative pabulum. It will have almost as little in common with Republicans as it does with Democrats. It will spare no space in the tent for pussies whose first instinct is to bend over and take it up the pooper. It will be unabashedly RealTalk, but its best politicians will need to be silver-tongued devils who know how to triangulate from samizdat hatefact warriors pushing the Overton Window into Genghis territory.
The Dissident Party will have four planks, spelled out effectively by commenter JohnnyWalker123 at Steve Sailer’s:
There are 3-4 major issues that Americans should fight on.
1. Immigration. There needs to be a permanent end to immigration to the US. Immigration lowers wages, erodes American culture, and creates a low-trust society.
2. Oligarchization. Our media and govt are controlled by a few very wealthy oligarchs. The masses of America need to use a variety of tactics (raising taxes on the wealthy, financial regulation, forming labor unions, stopping immigration, protective trade barriers, tariffs, effective usage of anti-trust laws, forming pro-worker third parties, creating alternative media) to break the power of the oligarchs. This is our country, not theirs.
3. “Deep State.” The military-industrial complex, intelligence agencies, and a variety of organizations and individuals constitute the Deep State. From the JFK assassination onward, they’ve been too well entrenched. They’ve become particularly powerful since 9/11. My view is that this Deep State is eroding democracy, freedom, and privacy. It’s also bankrupting us through parasitism and promoting policies not favorable to the national interest. There need to be limits placed on their power.
4. Traditional norms. Traditional norms with respect to family, religion, masculinity, marriage, race, and cultural/national identity. This is an issue of lesser importance, but I think that many of this country’s problems could be solved through strengthening through bringing back some of these ideas. Traditional American culture is actually fairly moderate by global standards, so a partial return to traditionalism could be beneficial without being repressive.
I don’t see fighting for HBD to be nearly that important. The reason is that even if we proved our HBD principles were right tomorrow, that might lead to policies that aren’t especially favorable to us. For example, let’s say we prove NAMs have lower IQs than whites. What’s the consequence of that? I could see our elites pushing for large scale immigration of Chinese and Indians (as is the case in Australia, Canada, NZ), which is not in our interest.
Proving HBD principles correct could also legitimize oligarchization and Jewish domination of our country. After all, if Jews and oligarchs are smarter than the average white, isn’t it best to put power in their hands? Shouldn’t the masses trust their “cognitive elites”?
Most common sense policies don’t even need a HBD-based rationalization. For example, we can justify cutting immigration by appealing to a wage depression argument. On an issue like ferility, we can justify aggressive family planning for less educated, lower income women (“1 and done” as Steve Sailer said) on the basis of wanting these women to invest in themselves. Non-HBD explanations work effectively and are probably more palatable to the public too.
Repeat after me:
3. Surveillance State
4. Return to timeless norms
These are the four digestible, media-ready Dissident Party planks. Get the branding and the message down before delving into the details. This practice helps clarify the mind and gird the spirit.
A 20-year immigration moratorium, of legal and illegal migrants. When the borders are once again partly opened, immigrants from NW Europe are to be favored, followed by Immigrants from East and South Europe. The rest of the world may contribute a few percent, tops. A little seasoning can be good for the stew. Note: A LITTLE.
Strip wealthy oligarchs of their power over policy and the composition of the nation’s citizens. Tariffs, big tax increases on the 0.1%, improved government oversight of their backroom dealings, very high minimum wages, and laws designed to limit the ability of the super wealthy to lobby for cheap labor.
We’re living in Big Brother’s world, just as Orwell described. I continue to be amazed that the average American isn’t more incensed than he appears to be by the constant surveillance. Bottom line: It needs to end. No more marketing firms collecting reams of personal data. No more Facebook shenanigans. No government snoops reading your late night pervy sexts to plate number three. Triple layered encryption should be the default condition for all consumer electronics, built right into the firmware. Eyes in the sky should be ripped from their street corner perches. I don’t want to live in a surveillance state; I want to live in a cohesive society with high trust levels that obviates the need for mass surveillance.
Roll back gay marriage. Cremate the rotting corpse of feminism. Send the race equalists scurrying into dank hovels licking their wounds. The Gods of the Copybook Headings wasn’t just a snazzy riff on cultural decay; it was a guide to the Good Life. Press the point that individual rights will wilt without societal norms to scaffold them. If none of this is possible, seriously consider the option of splitting America into regional powers.
I’ll have more on the coming Dissident Party in future posts. For now, the clarion call…
This is what separate countries are for.
Last first. It’s not a concept that readily permeates those in frantic pursuit of SJ, but separate countries are an ingenious concept. Within which is found latitude to fashion the brownish-yellow, climate conscious, transocracy of our fondest desires. All of this good work occurring free from bigot viscosity. Libs, it really is a matter of taking “yes” for an answer.
Incidentally, this was the purpose of Federalism within the constitutional framework. It’s a shame the 10th Amendment was written in invisible ink. An even bigger one that our judiciary hasn’t inadvertently unearthed it amidst all their assiduous penumbra excavations. Though the point of that mythical provision was for states to serve the distinct dispositions of their own citizenry rather than the foaming convulsions of those vicariously aggrieved. For any who prefer their clarions aphoristic: Living among those you like is better than living among those you loathe.
As for the list above, it’s good. And while most platforms only suffer by addition, there are some aspects to sharpen in the forge. A few of these I’ve mentioned before.
The immigration moratorium is critical, though insufficient. Our children are already minorities in America. Thus man’s eternal conflict for land, power, and resources is assured. War, expulsion, or Hutu dance parties are it’s likely expression. And so repatriation and revocation of birthright citizenship at some timeframe in arrears must be considered. The camel is fully in the tent. Saying “no more camels” doesn’t entirely assuage your concern.
And as an easy first win, agitate loudly for reinstatement of the “public charge” doctrine. The notion that we import millions of immediate teat sucklers is offensive to everyone. Well, everyone who pays the bills that is. The public charge doctrine held that any immigrant must be wholly self-sufficient and not a burdensome “charge” of the public. It’s rational, it’s right, it has precedent, and it would be wildly popular if put to a vote (so make sure you keep that idea well blanketed, Jeb).
Freedom of Association
Every human being craves this for themselves while being just as hungry to deny it for others. Though of course what we most covet is the freedom to not associate. And no man is truly off his knees without it.
Dramatically cut financial incentives for underclass fecundity. Especially negative taxation provisions like the earned income tax credit. Match this with crushing taxation on the super-rich, and robust domestic worker protections. Ease the burden on the middle class and offer substantial inducements to family formation. Here’s another aphorism: dysgenics is hell.
End foreign entanglements. Slash foreign aid, yes including to our closest ally. Dramatically reduce America’s global archipelago of military bases and consider the exotic theory that our armed forces exist to protect us.
The AQ (Adelson Question)
Creatures such as Adelson and Soros would never be permitted influence in a vertical society. Banning political advertisements outright is a topic worthy of serious discussion. If he couldn’t finance campaign ads, the taste of Sheldon’s feet would quickly turn sour on the tongue.
I’ll leave other ideas to those inclined. Though the sentiment is sound. Let dissent find its tribune.