Toddy’s Razor

The concept is far too obvious and simple to have escaped attention, though I personally haven’t seen a systematic expression of commenter Toddy Cat’s point rendering in the previous Bill Cosby post comments. That is to say how do liberals evaluate conflict when the truth is always irrelevant? The answer is through a tacit grading scale that none openly state (well some) though all understand.

I think there is something to commend of this. Mining a scenario for evidence, corroboration, or fabrication is difficult. It requires more cognitive processing cycles than most people care to devote and the effort to analyze evidence in the face of often contradictory statements. What’s even worse is when mere objective truth conflicts with the transcendent. Worse because we are obliged in rare instances by weight of optics to embrace grimy facts-on-the-ground, rather than the cosmic sublime.

And so what if we were to simply extract the former as an option? Eschew the filthy scavenging for technical “facts” in any given friction, and proceed directly to an adjudication of transcendent truth. Wouldn’t social justice be far better served? What does it matter if a white man is innocent, if white men are guilty? So we require a clear, repeatable methodology with results proven to ameliorate privilege in any situation. That was the framework TC began to articulate in the comments, and one we will refine and expand upon here. You may consider this an Internet RFC. The goal is not to inflame, but to advise. For any disagreements, skirmishes, rapes, or beheadings, the tabulations below will lead unfailingly to illumination of which party was in the right and which should be subject to hate-crime indictment.

It’s that simple.

The Tiers of Justice
+10 Genetically or ethnically related to anyone who survived World War II (Gentiles excluded)

+9 Black
Homosexual
Lesbian

+8 Handicapped
Transvestite (including self-mutilators of sexual organs)

+7 Heterosexual Female

+4/5/6 Hispanic (Amerinds, Mestizos, and Conquistadors)

+4/5/6 Arab/Muslim (we realize they’re not synonymous, but that’s a mere fact)

+4/5/6 Asian (including Indian and islanders)
Ratings still in flux.

+3 Infected
Dual citizen
De novo citizen
Member of non-white racial advocacy group

+2 Made statements critical of whites
Made statements in support of any non-white group.
Speaks heavily accented English
First name has five syllables and three apostrophes
Worships in a synagogue
Worships in a mosque
Worships Flying Spaghetti Monster

+1 Getting their life on track
Conquered their drug problem
Net tax consumer
Lives in urban setting
Listens to mariachi or hip hop
Displays African flag decal
Displays UN flag decal
Displays Israeli or Palestinian flag decal
A university professor, journalist, or community organizer
Hair in dreadlocks

-0- Made public statements yearning for the extermination of whites
Prior speeding ticket

-1 Male
Net tax producer
Listens to classical or country
Lives in rural setting
Hair in Buzzcut
English as native tongue
Has always had life on track
Never had a drug problem to conquer
Not contagious
First name: Steve (for example)

-2 Has American flag decal
A farmer or miner
Worships in a church

-3 Generic white
Owns a white car or pet (penalty for each)
American lineage extends to the Mayflower

-4 Blond hair/blue eyed man
Convicted of a felony defalcation
German (looks/sounds)

-5 Member of NRA
Convicted of a violent crime
Has a confederate flag decal or is a white Southerner

-6 through -8 Varies according to degree of having criticized up the chain of command:
White
Asian/Arab/Hispanic
Black
Jew

-9 Convicted pederast and/or cannibal

-10 Member of white racial advocacy group

8 thoughts on “Toddy’s Razor

  1. I’m smiling but it’s actually devastating. This isn’t just close to the truth, it’s a realistic description of how in liberal run societies various human types are assigned worth and credibility.

  2. MUCH more comprehensive than my crude attempt, and as pointed out above, this actually does seem to be the way that the Lefts works; you can practically hear them adding up the points in their head. And your statement “What does it matter if a white man is innocent, if white men are guilty?” sums up the SJW attitude better than anything else I’ve seen…

  3. A similar scale is used for deciding lawsuits. A party being a bank trumps being a pretty woman, which trumps being a homely woman, which beats being a white guy etc. Some judges give points for being Black or other NAM, but it’s less consistent than in the media-academia (macademia?) complex.

  4. It is coming back. Verily. I am entering another state of mania as I have escaped McClane mental hospital against my progressive SWPL parents wishes and have refused to enter a three month $25,000 borderline in patient program. Verily.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s