Night of the Living Narrative

Like me, you may have presumed the hoary cliche of Diversity is a Strength! had long since expired under a fusillade of ridicule. It seemed the input from a billion lying eyes had finally driven it out of active deployment. I hadn’t heard it mentioned in years other than as a sarcastic punchline. It’s sleek successor being a more pointed: Diversity is here. Now choke on it.

But that’s why we bury this sort of sophistry in the Earth’s molten core. Because deep down, it’s a really good idea. Though like so many other undead notions, this one yet lives.

How diversity makes us smarter. đźš˝

What follows in bold are quoted excerpts from the article.

Corporations spend billions of dollars to attract and manage diversity both internally and externally, yet they still face discrimination lawsuits, and the leadership ranks of the business world remain predominantly white and male.

Thus every penny spent on “diversity” is an egregious waste? Or is the message that the NBA spends millions of dollars to scout and manage players, and yet their teams remain predominately black? I wonder how the rest of the world tackles this thorny issue?

Diverse businessmen in China

Diverse businessmen in China


Diverse businessmen in the middle east

Diverse businessmen in the middle east


Diverse businessmen in Africa

Diverse businessmen in Africa

They don’t suffer our lack of diversity at all it seems.

The fact is that if you want to build teams or organizations capable of innovating, you need diversity. Diversity enhances creativity.

Incapable of innovating

Incapable of innovating


Unenhanced creativity

Unenhanced creativity

It encourages the search for novel information and perspectives

Diversity encourages the search

Diversity encourages the search

Even simply being exposed to diversity can change the way you think

Diversity changing the way he thinks

Diversity changing the way he thinks

on average female representation in top management leads to an increase of $42 million in firm value
stripper-money2

We put together three-person groups—some consisting of all white members, others with two whites and one nonwhite member—and had them perform a murder mystery exercise. We made sure that all group members shared a common set of information, but we also gave each member important clues that only he or she knew. To find out who committed the murder, the group members would have to share all the information they collectively possessed during discussion. The groups with racial diversity significantly outperformed the groups with no racial diversity. Being with similar others leads us to think we all hold the same information and share the same perspective. This perspective, which stopped the all-white groups from effectively processing the information, is what hinders creativity and innovation.

Unable to effectively process information

Unable to effectively process information

Significantly outperformed

Significantly outperformed

Sommers composed the six-person juries with either all white jurors or four white and two black jurors. As you might expect, the diverse juries were better at considering case facts, made fewer errors recalling relevant information and displayed a greater openness to discussing the role of race in the case.

As you might expect, the less-white juries were better. For no reason whatsoever I continue all these years later to marvel at such cavalier insults. White inferiority is simply what one expects to find–and one does!

Less white juries are better since blacks are models of sober jurisprudence. And as a surprising additional benefit they also bring a greater openness to discussing the role of race in a trial–and we all know how legendarily reticent they are in broaching that topic.

Then also the studious refusal to extrapolate the premise into anything beyond calls for fewer whites in the West. The world is teeming with examples of non-white monochrome leadership cadres. Presumably all of these would benefit from being reconstituted with fewer of the powerful figures now comprising them. Though suggesting such recourse can quickly end a lucrative snake-oil career and so studies fail to test and authors do not speculate. As you might expect.

So much cant, so much hypocrisy, so much science!

The point these ridiculous sophists are attempting to convey is that sound decision making benefits from the participation of a devil’s advocate perspective. A perspective that requires the replacement of whites in their countries and businesses no more than does the presence of ethnic cuisine. But we should always remember that people will more readily fall victim to the big result-oriented expedient than to a small one.

7 thoughts on “Night of the Living Narrative

    • That irony could not have escaped everyone on the Nature editorial board. Right?? Or are otherwise intelligent people really are that far gone, clueless fish swimming in lies?

      • Obviously white liberals and their non-white allies have wholly different mindsets. One is “race is bad” while the other is “your race is bad, mine is good.” This should create deep fissures, but does not since both simply agree that one race is bad and leave it at that.

        I’ve actually seen leftoids argue in the same breath that diversity is a strength and also a just punishment. That it can’t be both is irrelevant to their state of mind. There is The Narrative and that is all.

        To answer your question, my opinion is largely yes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s