America Hosts World Cup

America 2040, that is.

It’s unusual for fate to congenially offer such an uncluttered perspective into one’s future. For America–barring revolution, war, and partition–that future is Brazil. A shambolic semi-functional society populated largely by racial hybrids from three distinct genetic pedigrees. All spending a great deal of their time literally and figuratively fucking one another. Of course America may, in aggregate, select fists over genitals: in which case it will become an even hotter cauldron of tribal friction and constant racial boundary skirmishes. This instead of a bland gelatinous paste of brownish pinto-beans. Though both seem so appealing one may be forgiven for a lack of impassioned rooting.

In reading a bit on Brazil, something I intend to do with much greater depth in the future, this recent article on that country’s preparations for America’s future World Cup offered a brief sampler. Brazil is totally screwed.

…But with a 2012 average monthly income of $850, according to a report released last week by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), most Brazilians can’t afford to leave the country for a month. Instead, they say they will just lay low. “We’re stocking up on everything,” Yessica Souza Guimarães, a 28-year-old administrative assistant and mother of two, explained as she leaned over one of three shopping carts full of food at a grocery store in São Paulo. “I don’t plan to leave the house until it’s all over.”

Beyond the traffic and inconveniences the World Cup will bring to daily life, some fear it will bring something even worse. In the back of Sat’s, a popular chicken joint in Rio’s Copacabana neighborhood, the tone of a rowdy Saturday night darkened as the topic turned to the Cup. The bar owner, Sérgio Rabello, spoke with a burning intensity.

“Look at crime in our country. Our city is out of control. The police are underpaid and abusive. And now a bunch of gringos will be showing up rowdy and drunk. There’s no way this mixture will go well. This cup is going to be like a bomba going off. People are going to die.”

His fears are not unfounded. Rio is in the midst of a crime wave on the dawn of the World Cup. Homicide numbers are increasing in Rio state, with 1,459 people killed just since January, a number that nearly matches the high-water mark level of 2008, the year Rio’s favela “pacification” program began, with its aggressive police sweeps through the city’s roughest areas. The attempt to stamp out crime in the favelas may have even driven up street crime in other neighborhoods; street robberies and vehicle theft numbers jumped this year as well. Even the police are under fire: Police mortalities are up 40 percent from last year, driving some police to walk off the job, demanding higher pay.

In an attempt to avoid the perfect storm of police strikes and street protests during the World Cup, the government acceded to the threat of strikes by offering a 15.8 percent pay raise to federal police agents and calling an additional 5,300 federal troops from the military into Rio. Whether the additional cash and manpower will make an impact in preventing crime from marring the experience of the 900,000 visitors expected to descend upon the city remains to be seen.

And instability goes beyond crime, too. Major cities all across Brazil came to a halt last June with mass street protests set off by a five-cent hike in bus fares. The protests occurred during the Confederations Cup — a sort of World Cup test run — leaving the government shaken on the issue of domestic security during international events. The bus and police strikes over the past month underline the fragility of a functioning Brazilian state.

Imagining the Cup is an exercise in envisioning everyday inconveniences, but at a greater level, Brazilians worry about the longer-term consequences of an $11.5 billion event in a country plagued by corruption. In reality, the event is likely to cost closer to $13 billion; the $11.5 billion price tag for federal, state, and host-city preparations was last updated in September of last year, and many of the works included in the preparations are still unfinished. A recent Pew poll found that 61 percent of Brazilians “say hosting the World Cup is a bad thing for Brazil because it takes money away from schools, health care, and other public services.” And while one-third of respondents believe the tournament will create more jobs and help the economy, that hope is tempered by an overwhelmingly negative perception of how President Dilma Rousseff is handling corruption. For Brazilians, part of the World Cup package is not just a suspicion of corruption but a virtual guarantee.

In 2013, Brazil ranked 72nd out of 175 countries on the Corruption Perception Index compiled by Transparency International, a precipitous drop from its 43rd-place ranking the year before. The ranking for 2014, many believe, is almost guaranteed to be worse. Further, a new anti-corruption law is so rife with loopholes that many observers believe it may, perversely, increase corruption.

A series of structural failures during the stadium constructions, including the deaths of eight construction workers, have frayed the nerves of Brazilians. As she watched the news of the collapse of part of a stadium in São Paulo, Tânia Maria Martins, an environmental activist in the northern state of Piauí, said, “God help us if this happens when people are in the stadium during the Cup. What a shame it would be.” Fernando Morimoto, a businessman in São Paulo, complained as he waited in line for a taxi at the São Paulo airport about how the electricity had gone out at the airport in Rio, leaving him stranded there for eight hours. “What do you think the gringos will think of us when they can’t even use the airport because the electricity fails? Do you think they’ll be impressed?”

Some Brazilians don’t need to even ask these rhetorical questions. “We’re not afraid of embarrassing ourselves because we know we will,” says Thiago Baranda, a public servant from Manaus.

Infrastructure remains a major challenge for Brazil. In the 12 host cities, the construction of new stadiums draws a stark contrast against the crumbling infrastructure that cries out for attention. But as with so many public works in Brazil, many of the stadiums are still being finished just days before the start of the Cup, and other facilities, such as Curitiba’s media center or Fortaleza’ s airport terminal, have been all but abandoned midstream.

In preparation for the Cup and for the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro in 2016, the government promised to organize its visitor reception infrastructure. But these efforts often seem to only exacerbate the problem. Waits for taxis at train stations and airports can be hours long, thanks in part to the “streamlined” system of check-in kiosks and taxi stands introduced ahead of the World Cup. And for tourists hoping to stadium-hop during the tournament, beware: Last-minute domestic flights are often prohibitively expensive, and robberies on buses are commonplace. In many places, the interstate freeway system is a broken patchwork of cement where driving the speed limit is a wild, swerving ride taken at the rider’s own peril, and scores of Brazilians die in accidents each holiday weekend.

Preparations for the Cup were packaged into election promises during the last presidential election. Now many of those promises have been revealed to be unmet. For example, in 2010 a $300 million fund was set aside to bolster national park infrastructure in anticipation of the event under a project called “Cup Parks.” It recently came to light, however, that only 0.15 percent of those funds were distributed.

On June 1, in both São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, a party was held to celebrate the inauguration of a bullet train connecting the two cities.* The party was tongue-in-cheek, of course: Construction on the project has yet to begin. During the recent Easter holiday, the 270-mile trip between the two cities on the potholed two-lane road took 12 hours. Millions of fans will be making this journey over the coming weeks. Brazilians would likely recommend imagining being somewhere else.

But “Imagine During the Cup” is not the only slogan Brazilians are using to communicate their dread about the imminent train wreck of the World Cup. Other sayings are scrawled across walls in every city across the country, with more appearing every day. The pedestrian crossings in Rio are now stamped with “FIFA Go Home.” In the historical center of Salvador, a coastal northeastern city, “Copa Para Quem?” (“The Cup for Whom?”) scars the brightly colored colonial buildings. And in early June, angry, underpaid teachers gathered outside Rio’s courthouse, shouting, “Não Vai Ter Copa!” (“There will be no Cup!”).

But while these other slogans often tend toward the political, there is something pure about the “Imagine During the Cup.” It is not a demand. It is not a rhetorical question. Instead it speaks simply to the nationwide dread that cuts across all segments of society. It is Brazilians united as one, as equals, shaking their heads, looking each other in the eye, and muttering under their breath, “We’re totally screwed.”

Ahh vibrancy. So what’s the butcher’s bill, my friends?

* Three figure average monthly income
* Crime, corruption, and abusive, often dead, police
* Favela pacification programs
* Mass street protests and rioting
* Collapsing infrastructure
* Electricity blackouts
* Rampant crime on public transportation
* Unmaintained roads paved over with corpses
* And probably worst of all…gringos!

Frankly that all seems a small price to not be called racist. So don’t worry about the lights, they’ll turn themselves out…we’re loading up this gringo bus and careening over pothole and pardo…fornicating through the favelas…and we won’t stop until reaching that contract set-aside soccer stadium called diversity.

Everyone inside!

tumblr_mlq9f46ofx1s3xsayo1_400

5 thoughts on “America Hosts World Cup

  1. Multiply the misery and violence of Brazil by a factor of five, and you have some idea of what America and other white countries are heading for. The difference is that Brazil is a hierarchical society that never made any pretence at egalitarianism, although it may pay lip service to it. Most of the population have never known a decent standard of living and don’t expect it. In the US and Europe, the expanding mass of non-whites are taught from birth that it’s their right. Just wait till there aren’t enough whites left to provide it.

  2. An excellent description here (scroll halfway down) of the horrors of São Paulo, South America’s largest city. Sixty murders per 100 000 people, compared to New York’s 7.8. New York has only 10 helipads, on the other hand, while São Paulo has 240. That says it all.

  3. Shouldnt that be 850 bucks average income per year, not per month. Still better than much of Africa I hear. Conditions in the favelas are said to be very bad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s